There are almost no examples of the F35 being used for anamorphic.
Shame that it was never paired with 1.3x Hawks during it's time in the sun. I'd go that route in a heartbeat if I had the budget.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There are almost no examples of the F35 being used for anamorphic.
There was a film shot a few years back called "Legacy", starred Idris Elba in one of his first post-Wire roles. The DoP on that I was working with shortly after and he said they got a quote for shooting on 1.3x Hawks but the cost of the lenses alone came in at some frightening figure - it was well into five figures.
I haven't compared them side-by-side, so all I know is that the Alexa can hold burning hot details out a window that no other camera (or film stock) I've ever used can match. It's certainly more than half a stop over the Sonys.
The F35 makes a lovely image, it really does, but it doesn't match the Arri.
There was a film shot a few years back called "Legacy", starred Idris Elba in one of his first post-Wire roles. The DoP on that I was working with shortly after and he said they got a quote for shooting on 1.3x Hawks but the cost of the lenses alone came in at some frightening figure - it was well into five figures.
Anas are pricey, I priced up a set of the new Cooke Anamorphics for a four week feature next year. And the rental just for the lenses came to just shy of $20,000... for four weeks.
I think if I was on a shoot back in the day and I was comparing the F35 and the Alexa, I would have chosen the F35 nearly every time, very few scenarios where I would have preferred the Alexa.
I just saw a test where they are claiming the new RED Weapon now has 21 stops of dynamic range. Considering Kodak only ever gave their own stock 14, one wonders how many we really need? I see people these days knocking cameras advertised with "only" 12 stops of DR - the same as Kodak Vision 2!
I have seen the trailer for "The Revenant" projected a couple of times. I really don't think the look suits that film, at all - if ever I was going to make a case for something to have been shot on film, that would have been it.
I have seen the trailer for "The Revenant" projected a couple of times. I really don't think the look suits that film, at all - if ever I was going to make a case for something to have been shot on film, that would have been it.
Agreed, and interesting that we have two large format releases rolling out this holiday season, one being film and the other digital.
With the Alexa 65's massive CMOS sensor I wonder how bad the rolling shutter is.
I don't think they actually ended up shooting much of The Revenant on Alexa65. The crazy wide angle lenses Chivo used won't cover the sensor, so I read somewhere that it's mostly conventional Alexa.
They used Hasselblad Prime 65 lenses. I hear most of the film was shot with a 20mm lens. The Alexa 65 was definitely used a lot, they probably shot the whole movie with it.
I haven't the foggiest, but according to a bloke on RedUser (who says he heard it from friends who were on the shoot) it's Alexa 65 for landscapes, and regular Alexas for the main cameras.



