GH3 ISCORAMA VS baby HYPERGONAR, the anamorphic fight

S

seb33

Well-known member
Hello everyone, here is a quick and non scientific comparison between the Iscorama 1.5X (that I have just for this past week end) and my baby hypergonar 1.75X.


Iscorama 36
non MC
1.5X version, apparently more 1.4X, that what I've done on post
Yashica
55mm f2
Contax mount
VS
baby Berthiot Hypergonar
1.75X version
Contax Zeiss Planar
45mm f2
Contax G mount
on GH3
natural mode
1080 50P
light craft ND variable filter
Tokina 0.5 diopter
 
Last edited:
stoneinapond said:
So clicking on the title, clicking on vimeo logo at the bottom right of the embed, or right clicking on the main screen, none of those methods allow you to get to the vimeo page?
Click to expand...


The image posted is all I see. No links, no title, no logo...nothing to click on. Happens with all Vimeo embeds. (Oddly enough, only at this site, though. Vimeo embeds on other sites work fine for me.)
 
Worked fine for me.

That said, I think if I had to own one, I would pick the Iscorama, as the image seemed sharper and less distorted. The Hypergonar really seemed to push that "blade runner" look, for me at least, those ultrawide lens flares, and a sort of fringe on the outsides.
 
atarijedi said:
Worked fine for me.

That said, I think if I had to own one, I would pick the Iscorama, as the image seemed sharper and less distorted. The Hypergonar really seemed to push that "blade runner" look, for me at least, those ultrawide lens flares, and a sort of fringe on the outsides.
Click to expand...

Thanks atarijedi. Yes maybe the Hypergonar has more personality.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top