Hi,
i've noticed pros and cons for the mark ii vs canon 60
Mark ii
- more shallow depht of field
- better in low light
- wider view
(the 2 lenses 28mm and 50mm i use on the canon 60d would be perfect on a mark ii in terms of fields of view. I found them too telephoto on the 60d)
- better pictures resolution (because of better light too
(i don't see any difference in terms of video. But i see a difference in pictures. Most pictures i take with mark ii have better results that most pictures i take with 60d. Don't why but its like this)
BUT THERE IS NO SWIVEL SCREEN. I think its an issue for me.
Instead of buying a mark ii, maybe i could only buy a nikkor 18mm f3.5 or 20mm 2.8 to have a little bit wider angle to use with canon 60d.
Its hard to make a decision.
have a good day.
i've noticed pros and cons for the mark ii vs canon 60
Mark ii
- more shallow depht of field
- better in low light
- wider view
(the 2 lenses 28mm and 50mm i use on the canon 60d would be perfect on a mark ii in terms of fields of view. I found them too telephoto on the 60d)
- better pictures resolution (because of better light too
(i don't see any difference in terms of video. But i see a difference in pictures. Most pictures i take with mark ii have better results that most pictures i take with 60d. Don't why but its like this)
BUT THERE IS NO SWIVEL SCREEN. I think its an issue for me.
Instead of buying a mark ii, maybe i could only buy a nikkor 18mm f3.5 or 20mm 2.8 to have a little bit wider angle to use with canon 60d.
Its hard to make a decision.
have a good day.