HVX+VX2100. Question

mcvideo

mcvideo

Well-known member
In your opinion, i will do some test footage but until then i wanted to ask here and see if maybe you guys have already done this comparison.

Obviously i know footage from an HVX and VX2100 do not compare. But if i had to shoot an event with 2 cameras and since i have these two cameras would it be very obvious to the viewers watching the dvd later on a huge difference in quality? If the difference in quality is huge and take the viewers atention away form the footage then i rather not use the vx2100 and just stick to one camera. If i do end up shooting my project i would use the hvx as main camera for wide shots and the vx2100 as b tape, mide range close shots.

Input welcome..
 
depends on what you're shooting..

depends on what you're shooting..

I currently have a regular gig shooting interviews, it's a studio setting, very static.
I have an HVX and a GL-1 running. After some very careful lighting and camera settings tuning, I can cut between them with remarkably good results.
The difference between the shots isn't noticed by regular viewers.
 
any footage or screen shots you can post? i would appreciate that.
i wonder is compared to the VX2100 and the GL-1 would there be a diff. If so then i would expect a diff with the hvx and vx2100. i need to do some testing..

thanks for the post!
 
what codec are you shooting? The vx2100 only does SD so i would have to shoot DVCPRO50 to get the highest quality for SD with the HVX and shoot progressive with the vx21000..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top