HV20 vs DVX

I believe we have seen from vertical resolution tests done in the past that the HV20 falls short of true 1080 lines. It is closer to the HD 720p standard. This is a drawback of HDV. I don't believe HDV has ever attained a good 1080 lines of quality. Looks more like 720 blown up to 1080. Yes, there are 1080 lines there, just not a true 1080 if you catch my drift. To clarify my earlier post, 24p on the DVX looked better than 24p on the Canon in regards to geometry and the rolling shutter problem. My opinion having owned both cams.

The HV20 indeeds fall short of 1080 lines. So does the HVX, the A1 or the HPX500. "True" 1080p is a tricky word. Technically you can't have full 1080 resolution unless you have enough pixels on your chip, but none of these camera have it. Their chip size is a compromised between performance quality and cost. In a real situation you're never going to be able to get the full number of resolution lines because there's so many other factors involved. Saying something isn't "true" HD because it falls short of 1080 lines is just wrong because this disqualifies nearly every HD camera in existence.

This is like when people debate that 1080 24F isn't "true" 1080p because it's lower resolution. Look at some 1080 footage from the A1 versus a comparable camera with "true" 24p and tell me whether you can see a difference. The proof is in the image so people need to stop nitpicking.
 
Well since I have owned both. Not close. The HV20 screams more rez than the HVX200. Strictly talking res only. The HVX is a full fledge small form professional camera, the HV20 is not! However core image, I wish my HVX200 had delivered the same image quality as the HV20. If you record HDMI out, OMG god the HV20 delivers a pristine image even more. However, it's controls suck, suck suck. There are work arounds though.

The real question is whether the HVX has a higher resolution than the HV20.
 
Back
Top