blackdogs377
Well-known member
he meant HV20, hv30, and hv40. Not the HVX. the "xx" part was a variable.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, right.There is no single sensor cmos that is better than a dvx.
A camcorder that I bought 3 years ago for $300 (new, it was a cheap consumer camcorder) had native widescreen CCD.And in addition to that, the dvx could have been widescreen but then it would have driven the price up, taking away the accessibility that contributed to bringing most of us here.
Yep, that is what I meant.he meant HV20, hv30, and hv40. Not the HVX. the "xx" part was a variable.
24p by itself costs nothing if the sensor can be clocked at 24Hz (or 48Hz).It was a cheap camcorder but it didn't have 3ccd color pickup, 24p, 24pA, 30p, scene file settings, variable shutter speeds, manual focus or xlr inputs. This isn't debatable. 24p AND widescreen is more expensive than just 24p. It requires bigger sensors that cost money.
So I have come across a few problems with my DVX. I just started doing weddings and getting a lot of calls for future upcoming projects music videos, commercials but it seems as though everyone needs or wants they're projects in HD. I really love my DVX and I don't want to switch it up. But is it about time? and how can I compete with others who can offer HD at such a low price?