Shooter
Veteran
It's funny, our AF100 LCD's look very similar to a BT-LH1700--same green bias. This has always driven me nuts, but the 1700 is as close to the on-set standard monitor that exists at this point. They do not match any other monitors we own, so it's got to be some kind of Panasonic thing. I much prefer our TV Logic and Flanders Scientific monitor colorimetry.
It's harder to see the AF100 LCD bias with color bars vs. a neutral flat field of white or gray, and it's certainly evident with flesh tones. The fact that the LCD looks different than the EVF makes it clear that something's not right in color land--it's not pixel peeping, it's pretty obvious.
Hey Dino
With the same Monitor ( and in PAL - land) we use a fractional compensation by using the "Phase control" ( subtle).
With flesh tones and the shot of the eggs in my grabs ... we added 100 k warm color temp to the camera on top of our monitor "adjustment".
http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthread.php?234920-Screen-grabs-for-AF102Test-Shooter-NZ
Note: We did not measure the color temp of the lamps ( which we should have for proper methodology).
My conclussion is that the Panny AF100 ( and the HVX) has the fraction of green (typical of Panny) and that it requires a slight "adjustment" to compensate.
On set ... we call it the "Japanese eyes syndrome" ( similar to Japanese ears)
The bars are perfect as reported consistently. Its the WB and color temp in the image acquisition stage.
Easly fixed.