HansK
Veteran
I like the first image's look from a color point. The grain looks good for the still. But without it changing per frame it's going to look static and distracting.
I've thought a bit about why grain, and I mean dynamic grain here, may be desireable to people. I've read about how the eye appreciates movement. "Eye candy" is a term I have heard it called. Maybe the subtle movement that grain adds contributes to this "eye candy". A viewer doesn't know why but appreciates the image more. It might help more for shots with static areas. Thus the grain would add movement to those static regions.
I've thought a bit about why grain, and I mean dynamic grain here, may be desireable to people. I've read about how the eye appreciates movement. "Eye candy" is a term I have heard it called. Maybe the subtle movement that grain adds contributes to this "eye candy". A viewer doesn't know why but appreciates the image more. It might help more for shots with static areas. Thus the grain would add movement to those static regions.