Jay A. Kelley
Well-known member
ok Graeme, I admit it, I was on that "other" board a little while and I noticed a conversation with a Dalsa person (very nice and professional by the way).
It mentions that they could not get their Frames Per Second above 37.. And you guys are talking 60 for most everything.
So it seems to me that you have had a bit of a breakthrough here. I won't even comment on the possibility of 120 frames per second.
My question: Are the current numbers held where they are due to the speed of the chip, or the current data through-put limitations of the capture devices.
I am wondering if the FPS ratings will change over time as data through put gets faster, or it we have already hit the wall due to the chip
Jay
Are these good questions?! Hope I get an "A"
It mentions that they could not get their Frames Per Second above 37.. And you guys are talking 60 for most everything.
So it seems to me that you have had a bit of a breakthrough here. I won't even comment on the possibility of 120 frames per second.
My question: Are the current numbers held where they are due to the speed of the chip, or the current data through-put limitations of the capture devices.
I am wondering if the FPS ratings will change over time as data through put gets faster, or it we have already hit the wall due to the chip
Jay
Are these good questions?! Hope I get an "A"