FrameFarmMedia
Veteran
Definitely agreeing with you. I'd rather spend the extra money building around the Gh2 as a base with a view into the future as far as moving the accessories to another "brain". I do have more optimism for the Magic Cam than I should, but until that cam's out the price-to-performance (in IQ department) is GH2 territory.
It's a shame that I think A) Panasonic broadcast is going to abandon 4/3 altogether and move to S35 or larger, and B) the GH3 will be a marginal improvement over the GH2, with little to no gains in the departments that matter. Specifically, Dynamic Range and Lowlight Performance.
I agree with your forcast of the future. Although I do like M43 as a sesnor size but don't find a ton of size difference between the oversized m43 of gh2 vs s35. To me the things that make a bigger difference are codec, Dynamic range, colour info etc and I agree we won't see much improvement on the low end. I think each camera maker has realized that the race to the bottom isn't good for anyones bottom line.
The GH2 is/has served me very well now as I venture into the low levels of cinematography (make my day job money as a line producer/editor) and if I can make enough $$ upgrade down the road. There is a sense of freedom to be able to generate my own content to produce/edit and not rely on others when the budget isn't there.