Getting Back to Basics

ChuckS

Veteran
At the risk of being accused of trolling, I would like to mention something about a recent thread that was, thankfully, locked.

I have been coming to this site since the very early days of the DVX100 and have less than 1500 posts. So I don't jump in on that many issues and when I do I try to be supportive whenever possible.

What attracted me to this site was a real sense of community more about independent film making , I miss that. I'm not saying it doesn't exist now nor am I saying that there weren't nauseating technical debates in the early days, but it does seem that much of the debate is about ones and zeros and not about film making. And if that's how everyone wants to continue, I guess there's not much I can do about that.

However, I would like to point out a couple of things. The fact is that many of the people asking questions about the 7D don't even own one, if they did and used them there would be a lot more samples posted in the 7D Footage/Stills thread. Also most of the people shooting with DSLRs do not have access to a Red. So debating which technology is better is pointless.

BUT!!!, an aspect I love about shooting HD with DSLRs is that if you want to produce good HD video with one you pretty much have to shoot in manual, it forces you to think about and decide the right lens for the right focal plane, you really have to figure out how to get the proper exposure and how to work within its limitations, some of which aren't even apparent to many of the users because they haven't run across them yet themselves. So to my way of thinking DSLRs are a great step in the right direction to using a Red or F35 [for example]. Even if the Red comes with a DP any experience with a DSLR will translate to a more intelligent conversation between you and the DP hopefully saving time and money.

So I suggest spending less time debating the technology and more time debating technique. Why is it that there are so many technical questions but so few samples of peoples work and even fewer critiques of those samples? Not only do we all learn by doing and receiving feedback but there's a lot to be learned from providing the feedback. Context in this regard is important, I am always amazed at how good some of the Wedding Videographers are who generally have less than a day to produce it, one shot at it and they might do two or three in a weekend. There are several people like me, who shoot everything by themselves and don't have the resources or maybe even the experience to shoot a narrative so they shoot things that they're passionate about, post the results looking for feedback.

I would more than welcome anyone who reviewed something I produced and offered to write a narrative or produce a different piece of music for it etc.. I would like to get a lot better at producing and to develop relationships on this forum that would help me accomplish that. Are there ways we can come together as a community to collaborate, to support each other rather than be overly critical?

For anyone who has read this far, thanks for indulging me. Maybe I'm hoping for something that just isn't possible, maybe it's there and I just don't recognize it, I don't know. But I seem to remember a time when we would clammer over any DVX footage we could get and for the most part were respectful and appreciative of each others efforts.

:love4:
 
I agree. I am just getting into this whole video-making stuff, so discussion about techniques would be cool.
 
So I suggest spending less time debating the technology and more time debating technique. Why is it that there are so many technical questions but so few samples of peoples work and even fewer critiques of those samples? Not only do we all learn by doing and receiving feedback but there's a lot to be learned from providing the feedback. Context in this regard is important, I am always amazed at how good some of the Wedding Videographers are who generally have less than a day to produce it, one shot at it and they might do two or three in a weekend. There are several people like me, who shoot everything by themselves and don't have the resources or maybe even the experience to shoot a narrative so they shoot things that they're passionate about, post the results looking for feedback.
Excellent post, Chuck. (Just choosing this part to quote because it is so true and I believe worth repeating.)

I know a lot of entries in the last DVXUser fest (Betrayal Fest) were shot on DSLRs. I see those people shooting and doing and not looking for validation for the use of the tools. They let the results speak for themselves. I wish some of the people who are more concerned about "is this better than that" would take heed and let their results speak for them. It's been said more than once that the results are going to be different based on who's actually doing the shooting. We have quite a few talented shooters on this site. Geoff Reisner, Kholi, Timur, Matt Garrett come to mind right off the top of my head. I've had the opportunity to work with all but Timur and they are all more than willing to share their knowledge. That's been the beauty of this website. Knowledge sharing. We have an active community of people more than willing to help and share knowledge in their particular expertise. The way some things have been going lately, I can see why they might become hesitant to offer advice. I sincerely hope that doesn't become the case.
 
At the risk of being accused of trolling, I would like to mention something about a recent thread that was, thankfully, locked.

You aren't trolling, by any means. And a long-standing member. Longer than I've been here.

However, I would like to point out a couple of things. The fact is that many of the people asking questions about the 7D don't even own one, if they did and used them there would be a lot more samples posted in the 7D Footage/Stills thread. Also most of the people shooting with DSLRs do not have access to a Red. So debating which technology is better is pointless.

Absolutely. Do note that it's not the people who are exposed to better tech comparing, it's the people who've never touched it or worked with it extensively. Validation.

So I suggest spending less time debating the technology and more time debating technique. Why is it that there are so many technical questions but so few samples of peoples work and even fewer critiques of those samples? Not only do we all learn by doing and receiving feedback but there's a lot to be learned from providing the feedback.... ... There are several people like me, who shoot everything by themselves and don't have the resources or maybe even the experience to shoot a narrative so they shoot things that they're passionate about, post the results looking for feedback.

People aren't asking for that, though. They're looking to validate their purchase. Either by RED ONE comparisons, or constantly shoving down everyone's throat about House, Robert Rodriguez, 24, what else am I missing? Which one of you can fill me in on this?

'Cause, I'm not keeping up... it doesn't change my career, it doesn't change anything I'm doing... why does it matter who's shooting on what? I'm not any of these people, why do I need to live through them?

Chuck, if people were actually asking for unabashed criticism and feedback, trust that it would be given.

I would more than welcome anyone who reviewed something I produced and offered to write a narrative or produce a different piece of music for it etc.. I would like to get a lot better at producing and to develop relationships on this forum that would help me accomplish that. Are there ways we can come together as a community to collaborate, to support each other rather than be overly critical?

For anyone who has read this far, thanks for indulging me. Maybe I'm hoping for something that just isn't possible, maybe it's there and I just don't recognize it, I don't know. But I seem to remember a time when we would clammer over any DVX footage we could get and for the most part were respectful and appreciative of each others efforts.

:love4:

It's there. Any time I post on someone's work it's a pretty thorough examination, involved, and filled with questions. Count on it.

Sometimes, people come behind me with "Rah rah cheer horrah! Don't worry about the naysayers, this is awesome!" and it makes me want to delete my post.

It is what it is, though.
 
Absolutely excellent post, and you make such an excellent point about the manual nature of the DSLR bringing the shooter back to the basics.

Definitely, let's have less "vs." and more "how to"!
 
and for the most part were respectful and appreciative of each others efforts.
And thanks for pointing that out too -- because that's definitely something that we want to encourage, and the belittling has just got to go. Politeness and courtesy aren't just lofty goals for DVXUser, they're a requirement.
 
This is definitely a good post. And I know whenever I post anything on here, or Scarletuser, or DVi, I'm not looking for "how come you didn't shoot on that." I know I can make beautiful images with the camera I have, but I also know there are weaknesses and things I need to get around. But what I'm looking for is critiques and different ways I can make my awesome footage even better. Sure I'm flattered whenever I receive compliments, but you need more than that. And if you can't take criticism than you really need to find a different career path.

And I totally agree with the whole "validating a purchase" remark. People see that they used a 5D on House and they instantly think they can make just as good of an image just by using the camera. What a lot of people don't realize is it takes a hell of a lot more than a camera to produce something as good looking as House. Not only is it a good DP, good Director, good crew, its also years and years and years of experience, which you're not going to get by bickering over a web forum.
 
Back
Top