f64manray said
It's not the same. The process is completely different. Part of film making happens in the editing room while spending hours sitting next to someone editing a feature. They in effect along with you use the tools that are in front of you to shape the film.... for hours and days on end.
When you take a photo the process is similar (kind of) to production on a film but only very slightly. Moving images adds a whole other element of the creative process along with dialog and more. So very different worlds.
you also said
I'm not talking creatively but technically, so don't get into a theory discussion with me.
I'm a still photographer, and I've never had a client choose me because of the tools I use. They chose me because of reputation or after seeing my book when I was doing that sort of thing. My choice of tools never came up. I would imagine editing would be the same.
It's not the same. The process is completely different. Part of film making happens in the editing room while spending hours sitting next to someone editing a feature. They in effect along with you use the tools that are in front of you to shape the film.... for hours and days on end.
When you take a photo the process is similar (kind of) to production on a film but only very slightly. Moving images adds a whole other element of the creative process along with dialog and more. So very different worlds.
you also said
This is somewhat true but I will tell you if the editing system gets in the way of the flow, or fails to do a certain thing well or prohibits a client from getting what he or she wants then this can start to be pain to the client. They would hire someone else with the tools that can do what they want.As a client, I don't care how we get there as long as we get there.
I'm not talking creatively but technically, so don't get into a theory discussion with me.
Last edited: