Ben_B
Veteran
I've thought about it and decided that the Lumix 20mm f/1.7 and the Olympus 17mm (f2.8?) are not wide enough (despite their good speeds) compared to my 24mm f/1.8 to be worth getting...so I've got some decisions to make.
I am trying to decide to go for a 14mm Sigma f/2.8, some sort of Russian fisheye (going for wide angle not fisheye but crop factor should lessen the distortion...some, like the Zenitar fisheye, might not be wide enough [16mm]), the Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 (which does not have adjustable aperture) or waiting for the Lumix 14mm f2.8 that's in the roadmap.
From what I can tell the Sigma and the Tokina are both around $600 (sometimes new sometimes used), there are Russian/Belarusian fisheyes available at around the same speed for $200-400 but with poorer optics (good build quality though...metal...) and we don't know anything about the Lumix except that it will probably take forever to come out.
Right now for wide stuff I'm using the kit lens @ 14mm or in low light conditions using my 24mm f/1.8 and backing up.
I am trying to decide to go for a 14mm Sigma f/2.8, some sort of Russian fisheye (going for wide angle not fisheye but crop factor should lessen the distortion...some, like the Zenitar fisheye, might not be wide enough [16mm]), the Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 (which does not have adjustable aperture) or waiting for the Lumix 14mm f2.8 that's in the roadmap.
From what I can tell the Sigma and the Tokina are both around $600 (sometimes new sometimes used), there are Russian/Belarusian fisheyes available at around the same speed for $200-400 but with poorer optics (good build quality though...metal...) and we don't know anything about the Lumix except that it will probably take forever to come out.
Right now for wide stuff I'm using the kit lens @ 14mm or in low light conditions using my 24mm f/1.8 and backing up.
Last edited: