Thanks to all who replied to my question about Alister's comments on the use of slog2 or slog3 in low light. And to moldcad (hope your issue with Catalyst is solved!). Beforehand, I think no one is attacking Alister. All the information he gave is useful. His point of view is very clear, not only by what he stated in the article I linked, but also in the video he made about the FS5. But others may have different real life experiences. Mine have been a little mixed and much more in favor of staying with slog3 in Cine EI and ISO 2000. What Ben, Morgan and others explained just confirmed me that in the end, if you expose slog properly with the native ISO of the camera, you will get better results due to the look of hypergammas/cinegammas. I appreciate their comments because they have a lot more knowledge and experience than me. If others have different opinions it is fine. Sorry, Doug, if I gave you a different impression. I can assure you it was not my intention, since I just wanted to hear the experiences of others just like I enjoy seeing yours.