Justyn
Veteran
I know it's been beaten to death, but on Monday I got to check out the EX1 and it's LCD and all of that and man alive does it make the HVX LCD look like such a piece of crap. It's the bigest problem I have with my beloved HVX. I'm hoping that we get this figured out on the 170. Not only in it's sharpness. but also in it's size and scope and what's available on the screen. I've been forced to use a tool for two years that just plain and simply sucks and when you see another cam that has done it right, it double pisses you off. Sure, I use the viewfinder a good deal of time and always outside, but wouldn't it be nice to be proud of that you see in the LCD when showing it to clients. I'm tired of explaining that the real footage won't look soft and that it looks better.
Overall the EX looked like a solid tank of a camera.. man it's a lot heavier than it looks too and might be tough to handheld, but it's got some great low-light quality and that LCD alone is just stunning.
cheers all and just like to rant a bit and hopefully Panny will get their act together for the future versions.
Overall the EX looked like a solid tank of a camera.. man it's a lot heavier than it looks too and might be tough to handheld, but it's got some great low-light quality and that LCD alone is just stunning.
cheers all and just like to rant a bit and hopefully Panny will get their act together for the future versions.