DVX100 or Canon T3 1100d

I agree.. I am trying to light with both cameras.. see which one I get a better picture from... but using the M2.. gets pretty tedious at times.. so I am trying to learn the ins and outs of the T3 fast.. shutter. all that..
 
can anyone tell me the correct procedure of importing the video into premiere and what project settings to use with the T3?
 
this is a screen grab after I imported a quick clip into premiere.. notice the black all around the footage.. Im using 1080 at 25p.. shouldnt that fill the whole screen? im lost on this......
premiere image.jpg
 
Granted the dvx redrock route will be a bit more time consuming with lighting, but I don't think thats a bad thing. You will be more consious of your image due to the light loss issues of the rig. But some of my best lighting was when I use a dof adapter. And thats only because I want a clean image, nicely exposed image, and an image that has depth. Not to be mistaken with dof. what I see a lot of with dslr's, is that people dont spend as much time lighting as they should, they try to get by with nothing but ambient light whether it looks good or not. It's just easier to expose because of the low light ability. To me lighting is the most important tool in filmmaking, good lighting can make a beautiful image no matter what the camera is.


I couldn't agree more! I am so thankful I started out with film still cameras and the DVX as a video camera. The former taught me about manual exposure and metering while the DVX taught me about blown out highlights, how to deal with noise when you're underexposed, and not so much how to light but why. The last part is what is so important. What mood are you creating with your lighting scheme. Getting the shot with a DSLR in low light is just the first step in lighting it. Once you've taken care of this ambient light it's time to move toward depth, shape, and mood. It's a blast when you finally are able to achieve a shot that communicates through the lighting alone!
 
I couldn't agree more! I am so thankful I started out with film still cameras and the DVX as a video camera. The former taught me about manual exposure and metering while the DVX taught me about blown out highlights, how to deal with noise when you're underexposed, and not so much how to light but why. The last part is what is so important. What mood are you creating with your lighting scheme. Getting the shot with a DSLR in low light is just the first step in lighting it. Once you've taken care of this ambient light it's time to move toward depth, shape, and mood. It's a blast when you finally are able to achieve a shot that communicates through the lighting alone!

+10
 
First of all I belive that the T3 only shoots 720p video, so it would not fill up the entire 1080 frame.

most of the work I am currently doing I am editing in DV widescreen(720x480) so when I bring the DSLR footage into my timeline I either scale it down or crop into the parts I want to show.I have recently started working on a documentary with both cameras, I shoot both of them very evenly. If I am trying to travel lighter i just bring my DSLR with a Zoom H4 (which I would highly recommend as a companion for a dslr). But most days I bring both and have one of the other members of the team shoot with the dslr while I use the panasonic. I was recently editing a very short teaser and had a very similar dilema that you are having in editing because I had several people in up in the US asking for full 1080p HD video, but I was trying to edit with my two cameras, and some archival footage that someone gave me shot on a terrible DV handycam type camera. What I opted to do was edit the video in a 1080 video in premiere, up the resolution of the DVX and the other DV camera to 720 and down the resolution of the DSLR to 720 as well to give the footage a more consistant look throughout the trailer but also leaving a black box around the video for the whole trailer. The one issue I do have working with these two cameras together is when I try to push my DVX footage all the way to 1080, I am sure someone on here can tell you how to do it well (there are also companies making upres software ie red giant instant HD)

If you are interested in seeing the video you can find it here, there is dvx footage from 1:06-1:30 then a mix of T2i and DVX footage from 1:35-1:54, I made the file just 720 which is the highest resolution available on Vimeo but you can get an idea of the framing. http://vimeo.com/30935379

Hopefully something in here helped
 
can anyone help with the premiere inporting issue?

Sorry some of us have dodged the question. (I'm a a Final Cut Pro guy although I'd started with Premiere Elements.) You may want to bump this to the Premiere area since this part of your question is more geared toward editing software than it is the camera.
 
I think I figured it out.. wasnt even thinking that is WAS 720 footage..so i import it as that and no more black bars,..... gonna do some tests now.. see how it works now. Ill keep you guys updated... the premiere oart of it is only half the battle. I want to learn the T3 and make sure Iknow aht I am doing with it... the dvx is so much easier but I do like the look of the canon
 
it would be great to see some sample stuff of the DVX and T3 footage together when you have some stuff ready
 
we have a shoot coming up sat .. so im going to try and use both.. and ill put some raw stuff together jsut to see the differance..
 
Coolest rig I've ever used (so far):

DVX100B mod w/ Andromeda, Letus Extreme w/ PL mount. The look is just unmatched really.

Although I do love using DSLR's.... My 7D just got PL modded and it is incredible
 
Ok.. I have been working with the dvx footage and canon 1100d footage....25p and 24p... I do plan on "trying" to use both... so I have figured out how to convert the 25p footage to 24p .... it ends up 23.976 although when i right click on properties in windows is still shows 23p..
24converted.jpg

im not sure that is a problem.. I have been able to do this in vegas.. AE.. and premiere.... my biggest question and I know that this has been answered a million times,, but I plan on doing dvd-distro. and possibly festivals if and when this project gets done..

When I film with the canon I still use the audio setup going from Microphone to mixer to dvx100a... I get pretty good sound that way and i know I will have to match that up later in post.. but my main concern is what format is well the best or what I need to be using as standard throughout my project... QT, Mpeg2. Mpeg4....


getting closer but still need lots of advice from you guys that have done this ...
I also notice that when I am using the canon 1100d.. the focus ring seems very touch..for example when I use my dvx and M2 adapter. It seems thatI have a greater distance if tat is the correct way of putting it of focus.. when I use the canon seems very small.. and touchy.... is this normal?

Thanks
Terry
 
Hi everyone,
I just joined the site. Great stuff here. I'm still working my way through the information.

I have a question.
Last night a DVX 100B showed up in a local Pawn Shop for sale for $ 750. Is that price too good to be true?
I forgot to check the Hrs Used. Should I avoid a purchase like this? What should I look out for?
Advice please.
 
Hi everyone,
I just joined the site. Great stuff here. I'm still working my way through the information.

I have a question.
Last night a DVX 100B showed up in a local Pawn Shop for sale for $ 750. Is that price too good to be true?
I forgot to check the Hrs Used. Should I avoid a purchase like this? What should I look out for?
Advice please.

I can tell you what I'd do if I saw one. I'd grab one of my Panasonic mini DV tapes, put it in and record about 3 minutes of whatever. Then I'd rewind the tape and see if it plays. If it did, then I'd rewind it again and double check. T-reel and S-reel locks are a big pain in the a$$ and are not uncommon.

If thats ok, I'd check to see how many hours it has on it. It could have many hours of use at that price but, that's not a dealbreaker for me.
 
The advantage of the DVX is the audio inputs and greater dynamic range (in my opinion). I don't have an adapter so shallow DOF with the DVX is much more difficult to get than it is on the canon.

If you're seeing more dynamic range in the DVX... then you either don't know what dynamic range pertains to, or you're severely miss-using the Canon. A 7D has nearly double the latitude.
 
Thanks Olaf,
I went over to look at it again. It had about 300 hours on it.
The store was having a sale so I bought it for a little over $ 500. They have a satisfaction guarantee so I have a 30 day guarantee. I can return it for any reason in the first 30 days. I plan to take it out on Tuesday and test it out after I run a cleaning tape in it to clean the heads.
 
Took you're advice and just bought a canon T2i... should be here for the weekends shoot.. thanks everyone..
 
Back
Top