dvx 100 prices moniter: blame the hdx100

dvx 100 prices moniter: blame the hdx100

  • should have sold, boo hoo

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • scots git: (should have sold, boo hoo, im a bad loser)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • i wouldnt have sold till after now anyway

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • glad i kept it, i couldnt have afforded not to sell before now

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • keeping it, till i die

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
the simple guide is this subtract selling price from buying price, divide by number of hours used and that gives you a value per hour of enjoyment, cinema is about 2.50 per hour to view a hookers about 30 quid, you can use the same formula for a marriage, though you have to evaluate a multiplier for the relative enjoyment factor in both cases,
gef
 
An early post on this thread someone stated that
he wished the dvx had more weight ---------

I agree
my 35mm bell and howell eyemo is at least 15 lbs
and it serves as a counter weight to my upwards arm strenght
to cause stabalization
zI have enjoyed many years of hand held work often mistaken for chapman crane work when shot at 32fps ....!!!!
For the dvx there is a aftermarket thought
to add a ballast box or a weight box via plate and thread to the bottom of the Dvx .this box could have varable weight .

Sort of a mini cine saddle bag would be nice to have for the dvx
it could facilitate :thumbsup: quick hand held shots ending in a "set down ' shot with the camera on a rock , bench or top of of a wall ..
Cheers
Bruce :thumbsup:
 
An early post on this thread someone stated that
he wished the dvx had more weight ---------
as in the power to hire or fire, or to deceide where to eat or in the allocation of limited resources, call it dvxmba, that should do it:-)
 
Back
Top