Barry_Green
Moderator
Both. In 1080 or 480, we're talking about 60i. In 720, it's accomplished with 60p. There is, of course, no 60i in 720. The reality look is gotten with 60p.Mediacre said:Are we talking about 60i or 60P here?
Yes, you're right. I was in a mood that day. I apologize for going off the deep end, to you and to everyone else. And yes, the silly dancing dogs was an extreme exaggeration. Guilty...Worse than that silly dancing dogs one? :grin:
The DVX100 lens is also not 95% by my standards either. The DVX100A was a good improvement, but it's not there. It's far superior to the other cameras with their servo rings, and I find it usable, but it could be better. The HVX should deliver the missing components -- even better focus feel, and true ft and inches distance markings (just in the VF, not on the barrel). That's where I'm getting the guess of 95%, based on the progress that's been promised from the already-very-good DVX lens.Well, if it's like the DVX100 lens, it won't be 95%. Not according to my standards.
The DVX is not to that degree, no. In my opinion it crosses the line from "infuriating" to "completely usable". That doesn't put it up in the "exquisite" category, no... but it's usable. The DVX100A upgrades pushed it up to "nice". I expect the HVX changes to get it to the 95% mark. But, as always, it is a matter of personal preference.But if you think the DVX lens is a 95%, well, you won't throw the HVX in the trash. I guess it's just different standards. For me, not being stuck with one lens, not being stuck with a forever spinning focus ring and not being stuck without a physical iris doesn't account for 5 points only.