i shoot a fair amount of sd for my clients. lots of talking head interviews. distribution is on dvd, web and, occasionally, large screen presentation.
does a dvx100b still make sense?
i would surely say yes if i could shoot 16x9. the 4x3 in sd is very limiting. i know that letterbox works to create that illusion but its effectiveness is limited.
does a dvx100b still make sense?
as for tape vs tapeless, sure i'm sick of log&capture but i can give the client that tape as the archival copy.
pre-amps on a dvx100b are good enough. the pannie "look" is pleasant even in 30p.
does a dvx100b still make sense if i were to buy a low hour, well taken rig for less than $1k?
i'm just not sure if its $ that i should be using for an hd rig.
if you care to share: does a dvx100b still make sense?
thanks in advance
be well
rob
does a dvx100b still make sense?
i would surely say yes if i could shoot 16x9. the 4x3 in sd is very limiting. i know that letterbox works to create that illusion but its effectiveness is limited.
does a dvx100b still make sense?
as for tape vs tapeless, sure i'm sick of log&capture but i can give the client that tape as the archival copy.
pre-amps on a dvx100b are good enough. the pannie "look" is pleasant even in 30p.
does a dvx100b still make sense if i were to buy a low hour, well taken rig for less than $1k?
i'm just not sure if its $ that i should be using for an hd rig.
if you care to share: does a dvx100b still make sense?
thanks in advance
be well
rob