Review | POSSIBLE SPOILER ALERT! I watch the movies first time around strictly for enjoyment, second and third for review.
Just had a chance to check out Dreamcom. Dream subjects are my favorite and I've studied lucid dreaming and the like in extensive. Such great subject matter to work from.
Script - The dream movie has been done into the ground. And it's not about how many times it's been done, but how it's presented when you do it. Going with the idea that you had, Dreamcom Technology, is okay. I didn't feel that the concept presented it in a way that hadn't been seen before. At the same time, the writing that backed it didn't present a strong enough case for it to be included in the short. It didn't really stand out to me as anything about Dreamcom itself, but a guy's dreams. You might've been able to exclude the entire idea about Dreamcom and focused on his dreams, which would've allowed you to round off an ending instead of delivering a hollow message to the leading male and no real ending. I think the script needed/needs more reviwing and work. It's really hard to pull a dream themed movie off, no matter what length, and requires an in-depth look at what you're going for.
Direction - I didn't see anything that really stood out to me as bad directing. There are a lot of ways that you might see you could've improved on shots when reviewing. For example: The opening scenes seemed less like a commercial for Dreamcom. It was flat and unsurreal. I'm thinking if such technology were ever pitched to me, the cheesy "fly in your dreams" wow factor should probably be in the commercial to help sell it. And as well, the office scene: The camera view was more like Surveillance camera. Maybe this was because he was in a dream already? I dunno. But it stood out as "Hmmm...".
Acting - Your lead actually didn't do too bad. A third watch allowed me to pick that out. He wasn't exaggerating things, which tends to happen in shorts. It was a subtle conversation on the phone, which was pretty much how people talk to each other about dreams.
Cine/Lighting - Didn't see much creative lighting going on here. And the footage seemed to be really flat, washed of it's colors. Was this a choice made by the production?
Editing - Don't know much what to say here. Which means nothing stood out as bad.
Sound - I lked the ambient score/soundtrack. I'm a fan of such things so it worked for me. Little additional sound effects were okay. I could hear everything pretty well.
Special Effects - Nasty stomach being ripped out. That's the highlight of your piece. Dude got his guts ripped out like whoa and it was kinda gross to see your actors putting that mess in their mouths. Good going on that one.
Scariest Moments - The stomach scene by far.
Overall consensus - Script needs some work. Could stand to be shorter, I really don't think the Dreamcom part is necessary at all. Everything after that can stand on it's own since Dreamcom doesn't come back into the picture at all after the beginning. Thanks for exhibiting! Great job on entering!
Just had a chance to check out Dreamcom. Dream subjects are my favorite and I've studied lucid dreaming and the like in extensive. Such great subject matter to work from.
Script - The dream movie has been done into the ground. And it's not about how many times it's been done, but how it's presented when you do it. Going with the idea that you had, Dreamcom Technology, is okay. I didn't feel that the concept presented it in a way that hadn't been seen before. At the same time, the writing that backed it didn't present a strong enough case for it to be included in the short. It didn't really stand out to me as anything about Dreamcom itself, but a guy's dreams. You might've been able to exclude the entire idea about Dreamcom and focused on his dreams, which would've allowed you to round off an ending instead of delivering a hollow message to the leading male and no real ending. I think the script needed/needs more reviwing and work. It's really hard to pull a dream themed movie off, no matter what length, and requires an in-depth look at what you're going for.
Direction - I didn't see anything that really stood out to me as bad directing. There are a lot of ways that you might see you could've improved on shots when reviewing. For example: The opening scenes seemed less like a commercial for Dreamcom. It was flat and unsurreal. I'm thinking if such technology were ever pitched to me, the cheesy "fly in your dreams" wow factor should probably be in the commercial to help sell it. And as well, the office scene: The camera view was more like Surveillance camera. Maybe this was because he was in a dream already? I dunno. But it stood out as "Hmmm...".
Acting - Your lead actually didn't do too bad. A third watch allowed me to pick that out. He wasn't exaggerating things, which tends to happen in shorts. It was a subtle conversation on the phone, which was pretty much how people talk to each other about dreams.
Cine/Lighting - Didn't see much creative lighting going on here. And the footage seemed to be really flat, washed of it's colors. Was this a choice made by the production?
Editing - Don't know much what to say here. Which means nothing stood out as bad.
Sound - I lked the ambient score/soundtrack. I'm a fan of such things so it worked for me. Little additional sound effects were okay. I could hear everything pretty well.
Special Effects - Nasty stomach being ripped out. That's the highlight of your piece. Dude got his guts ripped out like whoa and it was kinda gross to see your actors putting that mess in their mouths. Good going on that one.
Scariest Moments - The stomach scene by far.
Overall consensus - Script needs some work. Could stand to be shorter, I really don't think the Dreamcom part is necessary at all. Everything after that can stand on it's own since Dreamcom doesn't come back into the picture at all after the beginning. Thanks for exhibiting! Great job on entering!