Bill__Turner
Well-known member
Re: DIY micro35 kit
Re: DIY micro35 kit
Nick Milo posted:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Redrock,
The footage looks amazing.
The close-up of the little girl looked real good. You should Post a vid once you get the new diopters set up. I'm not an optics master, but I though the rotating glass looked just fine.
...Hey Bill, what do you think?
Assuming I am the Bill in question: Clearly the shallow depth of field is acheived. Whether the quality is sufficient, I cannot tell from what I see on my computer screen.
As I said previously (probably earlier in this thread), my OPINION is that a simple form such as this, with and upside down image that you deal with in post has the best chance of decent quality at relatively low cost.
I do think that the longer focal length lenses used for the demo are not necessarily what one would use in telling a story , except for a special shot. I also believe and have said before that shooting video to look like film, is different than shooting video to transfer to film. I would be concerned about giving up image quality (resolution and contrast) in exchange for shallow DOF if I knew the end product was a 35mm release print.
These are my opinions based on experience and interaction with those who have done MiniDV to film transfers and tests, but hopefully some will comment. I think that when this device is available for testing under real world conditions to do real narrative work, then you will know more. I am sure there are many on this board qualified to put it thru its paces.
Bill Turner
Century Division
Schneider Optics
Re: DIY micro35 kit
Nick Milo posted:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Redrock,
The footage looks amazing.
The close-up of the little girl looked real good. You should Post a vid once you get the new diopters set up. I'm not an optics master, but I though the rotating glass looked just fine.
...Hey Bill, what do you think?
Assuming I am the Bill in question: Clearly the shallow depth of field is acheived. Whether the quality is sufficient, I cannot tell from what I see on my computer screen.
As I said previously (probably earlier in this thread), my OPINION is that a simple form such as this, with and upside down image that you deal with in post has the best chance of decent quality at relatively low cost.
I do think that the longer focal length lenses used for the demo are not necessarily what one would use in telling a story , except for a special shot. I also believe and have said before that shooting video to look like film, is different than shooting video to transfer to film. I would be concerned about giving up image quality (resolution and contrast) in exchange for shallow DOF if I knew the end product was a 35mm release print.
These are my opinions based on experience and interaction with those who have done MiniDV to film transfers and tests, but hopefully some will comment. I think that when this device is available for testing under real world conditions to do real narrative work, then you will know more. I am sure there are many on this board qualified to put it thru its paces.
Bill Turner
Century Division
Schneider Optics