Matt Gottshalk
Resident Preditor
They will find out that it easy to put out a spec sheet and some cool 3d models.
It is much harder to deliver a working camera.
It is much harder to deliver a working camera.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
WordYes. I think what happens is this.
1. You outline an idea on a napkin for the next great camera.
2. You research parts and suppliers.
3. You draw photorealistic 3-D models.
4. You get a preliminary agreement from some factory in China, that if you pay in advance and order, say, 1,000 units, then the price will be, say, $1,000 per unit.
5. You don't have $1 million, so you announce your product and take deposits. You probably will still have to borrow some money from a bank or investors to cover the order to the factory.
The problem is, you think that these are the remaining steps:
6. Receive units from China.
7. Collect rest of payment for each order.
8. Mail camera.
9. Profit!!!
But really these are the remaining steps:
6. Field phone calls from factory about unintended problems in making your camera.
7. Change design.
8. Receive first samples from factory.
9. Test. Samples fail in certain ways.
10. Call back factory and report problems. Work out fixes with them.
11. Change design.
12. Repeat.
As we've seen happen with Ikonoskop, Digital Bolex, AJA, and Blackmagic, these steps tack on a year or more.
Now that doesn't mean it will happen this time, for Craft Camera. I am all for being optimistic and wishing them the best. I just will not schedule shoots around the arrival of the cameras.
I heard that Craft Camera is actually owned / started up by RED. Anyone else on the floor of NAB hear this too? Supposedly RED wanted a lower cost camera that was modular. One that could not really compete with their own line but also not piss off current RED owners with camera's similar in spec but stripped down a bit.
I can't believe it would be true, but you know anything is possible. Many detergent companies launched several brands of the same product to "compete" with themselves at one point in time…
While virtually anything is possible, I highly doubt that Red is behind CRAFT. I don't see the value to them of starting a lower-priced, Red-incompatible modular line. Modularity has its advantages, but cost-efficiency isn't one of them. (Ergonomics isn't, either, but that's a different story). If cheaper was what they were after, a non-modular approach would be better, setting it apart from the Red line, should Red's involvement become commonly known.I heard that Craft Camera is actually owned / started up by RED. Anyone else on the floor of NAB hear this too? Supposedly RED wanted a lower cost camera that was modular. One that could not really compete with their own line but also not piss off current RED owners with camera's similar in spec but stripped down a bit.
I can't believe it would be true, but you know anything is possible. Many detergent companies launched several brands of the same product to "compete" with themselves at one point in time…
That's right, AFAIK.I though Jannard only left running the company not owning it.
Could it be someone that left RED because they were unhappy and started their own company?
I'm sure there's the plot for a movie somewhere in this.
same here.Anyway I placed my reservation/order. I'll go along for the ride.