Liam Hall
Veteran
The whole thing is a bit wackadoodle since the 95% effective method was an accident. at any rate, it seems that the sample size for the more effect dosage was too small to make a firm conclusion.
You haven't seen the data so you can't make a conclusion, firm or otherwise.
The other wrinkle is that Fauci now says we need as much as 90% population immunity to achieve herd immunity. (Which begs the question- was he lying to us before or is he lying to us now...)
I'm unclear on if that means he wants 90% to get vaccinated with a 70% effective vaccine. Or if we need 90% to actually be immune. If it's the latter, then we cant get there with a 70% effective vaccine
Fauci wasn't lying. He's simply answering the same question with different sets of data at his disposal. How much of the population need to vaccinated would depend on how transmissible the virus is, what efficacy the vaccine has and how long immunity is effective. All three of those data points continually change.
