ceejay7777
Active member
You what you're saying is that a "hardwired" solution such as the Alesis HD24 will be more reliable and cheaper than a computer based solution?
If that is the case, are there any cheaper alternatives to Alesis's HD24. I am on a very small budget i'm afraid and would struggle to buy a HD24, but i'd be able to if i have to.
An Alesis HD24 IS the cheapest solution to getting 24 tracks reliably recorded live. By the time you put together a PC-based system to do the same job, it will cost a lot more.
Don't forget, you've also yet to get 24 discrete line level signals from your PA desk to the recorder - whatever it is, and that's an additional cost.
It's an entirely unecessary idea. ONE firewire interface is capable of delivering 24 channels. For example, my rig is based on a Focusrite Saffire Pro 26 which is capable of pushing 26 channels down a single firewire cable - 8 mics, 16 ADAT lightpipe and 2 SPDIF. I frontend the Saffire with a Soundcraft Digital 328 desk which outputs the 16 ADAT and 2 SPDIF.Would daisy chaining about 4 4 channel firewire interfaces to a laptop be a bad idea?
Now, I've never used it live in this way and I'm not convinced it would be reliable enough to record all 26 tracks consistently on a live gig.
Bottom line - if you can't afford an HD24, then you can't afford to record 24 tracks. You'll be much better off as has been suggested earlier by coming out of the groups and record 8 tracks via a firewire interface to your PC plus a stereo ambience track on your wide camera. A mix of those ten tracks will be more than adequate for most purposes.