Cineform vs FCP Conversion

Exact

Veteran
I've seen several people recommend the Cineform conversion tools and I was wondering if there is any real world on-screen difference in quality between the conversions done by Cineform and the conversions done by FCP during Log & Transfer?
 
It looks good.

But why not go with pro res, because it's bundled with FCP?

Also, previous versions of Neoscene did not tie into the RT FCP engine. This meant rendering for something as little as a CC.

This may have changed.
 
I think it's really hard to compete with the level of performance ProRes achieves in FCP, because ProRes edits like butter.
 
Back
Top