E Exact Veteran Oct 15, 2009 #1 I've seen several people recommend the Cineform conversion tools and I was wondering if there is any real world on-screen difference in quality between the conversions done by Cineform and the conversions done by FCP during Log & Transfer?
I've seen several people recommend the Cineform conversion tools and I was wondering if there is any real world on-screen difference in quality between the conversions done by Cineform and the conversions done by FCP during Log & Transfer?
David Saraceno Moderator Staff member Oct 15, 2009 #2 It looks good. But why not go with pro res, because it's bundled with FCP? Also, previous versions of Neoscene did not tie into the RT FCP engine. This meant rendering for something as little as a CC. This may have changed.
It looks good. But why not go with pro res, because it's bundled with FCP? Also, previous versions of Neoscene did not tie into the RT FCP engine. This meant rendering for something as little as a CC. This may have changed.
Ed Kishel Veteran Oct 15, 2009 #3 a big advantage is that the pro level cineform products also include first light http://techblog.cineform.com/?p=1325
a big advantage is that the pro level cineform products also include first light http://techblog.cineform.com/?p=1325
P pailes Well-known member Oct 15, 2009 #4 I think it's really hard to compete with the level of performance ProRes achieves in FCP, because ProRes edits like butter.
I think it's really hard to compete with the level of performance ProRes achieves in FCP, because ProRes edits like butter.