The Irish TRex
Well-known member
Having trouble making up my mind on which camera to get under $1k. I will be using these cameras primarily for stills but video is important as well. I have limited experience with DSLR's, etc. but my wife and I have kid(s) now and the speed of my Canon S90 isn't cutting it for capturing our little guy on the move. The most important things to me are (in order):
1) Fast Autofocus (minimal shutter lag, etc) ***MOST IMPORTANT*** (Hence why camera #2 is suddenly on my list after messing with it today)
2) Shallow DoF (hence why all my cameras are about the same sensor size)
3) Low light Performance
4) Would prefer smaller body if possible
With that in mind, please note that I have NO lenses so I'm not invested yet in any "brand". I know Canon has more lenses but Sony and Canon both offer good affordable lenses and I'm hoping to stay under $1k anyway so the idea that Canon has great $2k lenses does not matter at all to me for this purchase. If money were not a factor here I'd be going Full Frame anyway so the sheer # of lenses isn't a huge deal to me. My main reason for considering Sony is their reviews are really good on these two cameras and I would get a 25% discount (via family member who works for Sony).
Right now these are the cameras I'm considering given the 3 things listed above that are most important:
1) Sony NEX-6 - PRO: Great size and feel when I tested it. Also had a very snappy AF performance (although #2 was slightly faster when using optical viewfinder). 1080p60, and wifi option is nice to have as well as the articulating screen, but again, my #1 feature is shutter lag and AF speed. Also, I'd get about 25% off making it really affordable. CON: Did not have the INSTANT AF speed of the SL1 (when using viewfinder) in my tests which was the main reason for me coming here to the Canon forum.
2) Canon SL1 - PRO: I wasn't considering this at all but just played around with one today for the first time and while the Live View on the LCD was MUCH slower for AF, when using the Optical Viewfinder the AF was almost instant which was AWESOME!!! This totally took me by surprise. Also it's small for a DSLR which my wife will like CON: Still bigger than the NEX6.
3) Sony a77 - PRO: Had great AF in video mode which I loved and pretty fast AF/minimal shutter lag for stills. Shoots 1080p60 which I personally like and again, I have a family member working for Sony so I'd get essentially 25% off.
CON: Way bulkier than I want to go ideally.
4) Canon t3i with ML - PRO: Not really sure about this one because I've never used it. How fast is it's AF compared to SL1? It's on the list because from what I've read it seems to be a much better camera with Magic Lantern for both photos (the in between ISO's help apparently?) and video (more settings/control) CON: Bigger than I would like.
How does the t3i match up in terms of AF speed and shutter lag, etc. to the near instant speed of the SL1 (when using the viewfinder only of course)???
I know there are newer t4i and t5i options as well as good older models for decent used prices, but again, I'm trying to keep it small if possible. But I'd consider them if the AF was as fast as the SL1 was using the optical viewfinder.
My top choice was really the NEX-6 this whole week since it's pretty solid all around and I'll get the 25% off discount making it VERY affordable. This was my top choice until about an hour ago when I stopped into a Best Buy just to mess with each of these and realized how incredibly fast the SL1's viewfinder AF was. Are their any other cameras under $1k that can match it's AF/speed performance (any brand)? It was pretty much instant which, although the Sony's were damn good, was definitely the top performer. Granted the back LCD view was much slower on the SL1 than both of the Sony cameras, but I can live with that I suppose.
So based upon my top priorities, any experience with these cameras and which would you recommend?
1) Fast Autofocus (minimal shutter lag, etc) ***MOST IMPORTANT*** (Hence why camera #2 is suddenly on my list after messing with it today)
2) Shallow DoF (hence why all my cameras are about the same sensor size)
3) Low light Performance
4) Would prefer smaller body if possible
With that in mind, please note that I have NO lenses so I'm not invested yet in any "brand". I know Canon has more lenses but Sony and Canon both offer good affordable lenses and I'm hoping to stay under $1k anyway so the idea that Canon has great $2k lenses does not matter at all to me for this purchase. If money were not a factor here I'd be going Full Frame anyway so the sheer # of lenses isn't a huge deal to me. My main reason for considering Sony is their reviews are really good on these two cameras and I would get a 25% discount (via family member who works for Sony).
Right now these are the cameras I'm considering given the 3 things listed above that are most important:
1) Sony NEX-6 - PRO: Great size and feel when I tested it. Also had a very snappy AF performance (although #2 was slightly faster when using optical viewfinder). 1080p60, and wifi option is nice to have as well as the articulating screen, but again, my #1 feature is shutter lag and AF speed. Also, I'd get about 25% off making it really affordable. CON: Did not have the INSTANT AF speed of the SL1 (when using viewfinder) in my tests which was the main reason for me coming here to the Canon forum.
2) Canon SL1 - PRO: I wasn't considering this at all but just played around with one today for the first time and while the Live View on the LCD was MUCH slower for AF, when using the Optical Viewfinder the AF was almost instant which was AWESOME!!! This totally took me by surprise. Also it's small for a DSLR which my wife will like CON: Still bigger than the NEX6.
3) Sony a77 - PRO: Had great AF in video mode which I loved and pretty fast AF/minimal shutter lag for stills. Shoots 1080p60 which I personally like and again, I have a family member working for Sony so I'd get essentially 25% off.
4) Canon t3i with ML - PRO: Not really sure about this one because I've never used it. How fast is it's AF compared to SL1? It's on the list because from what I've read it seems to be a much better camera with Magic Lantern for both photos (the in between ISO's help apparently?) and video (more settings/control) CON: Bigger than I would like.
How does the t3i match up in terms of AF speed and shutter lag, etc. to the near instant speed of the SL1 (when using the viewfinder only of course)???
I know there are newer t4i and t5i options as well as good older models for decent used prices, but again, I'm trying to keep it small if possible. But I'd consider them if the AF was as fast as the SL1 was using the optical viewfinder.
My top choice was really the NEX-6 this whole week since it's pretty solid all around and I'll get the 25% off discount making it VERY affordable. This was my top choice until about an hour ago when I stopped into a Best Buy just to mess with each of these and realized how incredibly fast the SL1's viewfinder AF was. Are their any other cameras under $1k that can match it's AF/speed performance (any brand)? It was pretty much instant which, although the Sony's were damn good, was definitely the top performer. Granted the back LCD view was much slower on the SL1 than both of the Sony cameras, but I can live with that I suppose.
So based upon my top priorities, any experience with these cameras and which would you recommend?
Last edited: