Hey guys,
I have a set of primes but none of superior quality and im considering going to sigma 18-35 + 50-100 once it is out, however I also use mirrorless cameras such as GH4 and dont have a metabones adapter, Ideally I would like to be able to use my lenses across my cameras, now I could get the Canon metabones adapter but its expensive for just an adapter, whereas If i get the nikon mount I could get an adapter that was much cheaper...
I never use autofocus and have always used manual lenses so is there any reason I should go with the canon mount over the nikon apart from it being a native mount for the C100?
thanks
I have a set of primes but none of superior quality and im considering going to sigma 18-35 + 50-100 once it is out, however I also use mirrorless cameras such as GH4 and dont have a metabones adapter, Ideally I would like to be able to use my lenses across my cameras, now I could get the Canon metabones adapter but its expensive for just an adapter, whereas If i get the nikon mount I could get an adapter that was much cheaper...
I never use autofocus and have always used manual lenses so is there any reason I should go with the canon mount over the nikon apart from it being a native mount for the C100?
thanks