Hello from Russia Moscow
At us in city have tested the HV20 and the following was found out:
The tape drive mechanism works is noisy -33dB
The cover of the cartridge has a small crack
Whether also there is a basic difference between PAL and NTSC versions?
Who what has an opinion on noisy work of the camera...??
Forgive for my bad English...
And as then to understand that the user writes at a forum
I quote
Note that this is PAL-version, so where shot in 50i you have 20 % more bits per frame (20 % less frames/sec), and where 25p (any?) you have 15 % more bits (20 % boost due to absent hard-telecine, 1 frame more resulting in 5 % less bits). "
Yes tell a sound of the mechanism does not record on tape?
I can on NTSC recode to the chamber old cassette VHS (PAL) on the through channel?
How you think if to buy HV20 NTSC collected for Japan - quality of assembly will be better than HV20 PAL for the Europe?
I had in view of basic distinction as shooting between PAL and NTSC - At you what HV20 using?
At us in city have tested the HV20 and the following was found out:
The tape drive mechanism works is noisy -33dB
The cover of the cartridge has a small crack
Whether also there is a basic difference between PAL and NTSC versions?
Who what has an opinion on noisy work of the camera...??
Forgive for my bad English...
And as then to understand that the user writes at a forum
I quote
Note that this is PAL-version, so where shot in 50i you have 20 % more bits per frame (20 % less frames/sec), and where 25p (any?) you have 15 % more bits (20 % boost due to absent hard-telecine, 1 frame more resulting in 5 % less bits). "
Yes tell a sound of the mechanism does not record on tape?
I can on NTSC recode to the chamber old cassette VHS (PAL) on the through channel?
How you think if to buy HV20 NTSC collected for Japan - quality of assembly will be better than HV20 PAL for the Europe?
I had in view of basic distinction as shooting between PAL and NTSC - At you what HV20 using?