well im a big fan since the c500 came out , i have bought it for a while now but never used it much , due to the pl mount and when i used it couple tme it was only on hd , till the last month when i purchase my shogun and went to making a short film , i was very disappointed of the result
i have been watching on the net the tests and comparison and really i loved the c500 what does in the low light , but when i did exactly what they said didnt like it much , is it me who set the camera wrong or it suppose to do this , or its the shogun
i remember i saw the test of the video where they showed the c500 cranck the iso to 3200 and still useablbe not in my case i pit my iso in 2000 even 1600 and showed to much noise and was on c log film
please look at the grabs 2 of each one is from the mxf hd and the other is from the shogun 4k they both flat no lut added
thank you
i have been watching on the net the tests and comparison and really i loved the c500 what does in the low light , but when i did exactly what they said didnt like it much , is it me who set the camera wrong or it suppose to do this , or its the shogun
i remember i saw the test of the video where they showed the c500 cranck the iso to 3200 and still useablbe not in my case i pit my iso in 2000 even 1600 and showed to much noise and was on c log film
please look at the grabs 2 of each one is from the mxf hd and the other is from the shogun 4k they both flat no lut added
thank you


