Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wonder what kind of change of pricing we will see from Canon on their new c300/500 and 1d-c..
There is lot of very positive talk about new F5 on net.
I think Canon can easily design something else to go head to head with Sony.
The idea is to maintain your Average Selling Price so you can bank on reducing costs later in order to recover profits rather than killing price and therefore the consumer psychology altogether.
Have you ever, ever, ever seen Canon adjust pricing on ANY professional video camera model, ever, in their history, ever? I haven't.
The XLH1, a model they couldn't give away, and that probably sold fewer than 500 units ever, was still listed at $8999 up until the day it was discontinued.
Canon still lists the GL2 (yes, the standard-def DV tape GL2) in their pro division. For $2,799. The GL2 was first introduced in 2002(!) It's ten years old, it's been vastly surpassed by many other cameras, it was destroyed by the DVX100, and yet ten years later, it's selling for the same price as when it was introduced. I found on DVInfo a report from a guy who ordered one from Zotz Digital at a discounted price of $2600. Ten years later, woefully outdated and long past its sell-by date, the GL2 is still selling for the same MSRP as when it was introduced.
The moral of the story? Canon doesn't "do" price drops.
Will the price of the C500 change, even one nickel, even if the Epic drops to $15,000? Don't count on it. I would bet the price of the C500 will be exactly the same one year from now, as it is today, regardless of what Sony or Red do. It's just how the company works, and how they've always worked.
Probably true.If they do not change they will sell not even HALF of what they should
I don't concern myself with DSLRs, I don't know what they may or may not do over time, they're consumer commodity items. But I've been watching pro video for the last decade,
DSLRs have greatly impacted the pro market for 4 years now - whether you concern yourself with them or not.
We've used them on national TV work and high end film work for the Olympics and major orgs and corps - they've obviously been used repeatedly in features.
What took place over the last decade in pro video has little to do with what will happen now and over the next half decade.
It is a different reality with many blurred lines going forward.
The last decade is history as will be Canon's market share if you're right, because the eos/C line won't be competitive with anyone - from Panasonic to BMC - a year from now.
Premium prices for limited functionality simply won't work going forward.
It's not a sustainable business model for any company let alone one with shrinking income in a sour economy.
Again, perhaps so -- but that doesn't mean the existing companies will suddenly lurch to a new business model. Again, it took Canon from 2008, with the introduction of the 5D, until 2012 or nigh unto 2013 to come out with a (relatively) affordable pro version of their existing DSLR.DSLRs have greatly impacted the pro market for 4 years now - whether you concern yourself with them or not.
We've used them on national TV work and high end film work for the Olympics and major orgs and corps - they've obviously been used repeatedly in features.
What took place over the last decade in pro video has little to do with what will happen now and over the next half decade.
Well, again, people said that when Red announced the Scarlet (also in 2008) that Panasonic, Sony, and Canon were all out of business effective immediately. That didn't happen either. I suspect Panasonic, Sony, Canon, BlackMagic and Red will all be in business a year from now. And Canon will sell very few of their models, comparatively, just like their HDV pro line never sold in a tenth the quantities of the HVX or Z1U or EX1. Apparently they're comfortable with the overpriced niche, as they've been occupying it for many many years.The last decade is history as will be Canon's market share if you're right, because the eos/C line won't be competitive with anyone - from Panasonic to BMC - a year from now.
I would agree, but -- look, frankly, the DSLRs were horrible to shoot on, had extremely limited functionality and tons of problems, and they still became very popular. The C300 and C500 don't really have any problems at all, they're just expensive and don't have quite as many features as the competition. And Canon doesn't give a flying hoot about selling those to individuals, they're focused on Hollywood. If Hollywood has bought into the "Canon" name, they'll continue to buy into C300's and C500's, as long as they do the job.Premium prices for limited functionality simply won't work going forward.
It's not a sustainable business model for any company let alone one with shrinking income in a sour economy.
Have you ever, ever, ever seen Canon adjust pricing on ANY professional video camera model, ever, in their history, ever? I haven't.
The XLH1, a model they couldn't give away, and that probably sold fewer than 500 units ever, was still listed at $8999 up until the day it was discontinued.
Canon still lists the GL2 (yes, the standard-def DV tape GL2) in their pro division. For $2,799. The GL2 was first introduced in 2002(!) It's ten years old, it's been vastly surpassed by many other cameras, it was destroyed by the DVX100, and yet ten years later, it's selling for the same price as when it was introduced. I found on DVInfo a report from a guy who ordered one from Zotz Digital at a discounted price of $2600. Ten years later, woefully outdated and long past its sell-by date, the GL2 is still selling for the same MSRP as when it was introduced.
The moral of the story? Canon doesn't "do" price drops.
Will the price of the C500 change, even one nickel, even if the Epic drops to $15,000? Don't count on it. I would bet the price of the C500 will be exactly the same one year from now, as it is today, regardless of what Sony or Red do. It's just how the company works, and how they've always worked.