Nicholas Natteau
Veteran
I'm so impressed with how great the picture is in it's "baked state" coming out of the C300, that I wonder if it's really preferable to shoot in C-Log if you're using the C300 for shooting documentaries.
I understand that C-Log gives you a lot more flexibility/freedom to tweak the image. And I can see why this would be preferable for a fictional piece. But given that the C300, C100, and 1DC do not shoot RAW, you're not going to be able to tweak the image as much as you would if you were shooting RAW with a C500 or BMC.
If you're like me and you're not experienced with color correction and can't afford to hire a professional colorist, are you not better off (safer) leaving the C300 picture profile set to it's default "off" state. Shooting C-log seems like an extra step (and a lot more post-work to do) when the baked picture already seems perfect. But that's just my personal opinion.
Curious to hear how the rest of you feel about the baked look coming out of the C100, C300.
Do you feel it's good looking enough? Or would you always prefer shooting in C-log?
I understand that C-Log gives you a lot more flexibility/freedom to tweak the image. And I can see why this would be preferable for a fictional piece. But given that the C300, C100, and 1DC do not shoot RAW, you're not going to be able to tweak the image as much as you would if you were shooting RAW with a C500 or BMC.
If you're like me and you're not experienced with color correction and can't afford to hire a professional colorist, are you not better off (safer) leaving the C300 picture profile set to it's default "off" state. Shooting C-log seems like an extra step (and a lot more post-work to do) when the baked picture already seems perfect. But that's just my personal opinion.
Curious to hear how the rest of you feel about the baked look coming out of the C100, C300.
Do you feel it's good looking enough? Or would you always prefer shooting in C-log?