gkantziper
Esteemed Member
'SDI' is that ancient configuration that's been around for years - yes?
Yes, and it's far better than HDMI in terms of the connection and ability to use cheap and long BNC cables. Still the industry standard.
So the 'Resolution Stats' are not any better 200A vs. 170? Both still 1080 - yes?
Well, sort of 1080 as it is upressed from something less than 1080 internally.
Except the 200A is definitely better in 'Low Light' (Had enuf of that with the 100B LOL)
200A is better in low light than 200, but same as 170 AFAIK
The XLR inputs (always a nice feature with those Panny's) is the same for the 200, 200A & 170- yes?
Yes
Well then it gets down to price. (Not sure where the 250 fits in price wise - we'll see)
250 will be a lot more as it is way more camera. Real 1080 and better codecs. Better lens. Better everything.
The 170's are definitely selling higher.
200A is probably your cheapest, logical choice.
Yes, and it's far better than HDMI in terms of the connection and ability to use cheap and long BNC cables. Still the industry standard.
So the 'Resolution Stats' are not any better 200A vs. 170? Both still 1080 - yes?
Well, sort of 1080 as it is upressed from something less than 1080 internally.
Except the 200A is definitely better in 'Low Light' (Had enuf of that with the 100B LOL)
200A is better in low light than 200, but same as 170 AFAIK
The XLR inputs (always a nice feature with those Panny's) is the same for the 200, 200A & 170- yes?
Yes
Well then it gets down to price. (Not sure where the 250 fits in price wise - we'll see)
250 will be a lot more as it is way more camera. Real 1080 and better codecs. Better lens. Better everything.
The 170's are definitely selling higher.
200A is probably your cheapest, logical choice.