I am starting off and i am looking into filming sports (extreme mostly) /commericals/music videos. I am looking into the hmc40 and almost 100% getting it this coming fall, but here is what i have been told. My colleagues feel that getting the t2i which is roughly half the price would be much better because then i could afford a very nice lens and also a glidecam/indislider. I feel that for what i want to get into that the hmc40 is better (manual controls for instance). the only upside to a dslr is the light (low light isnt very great in hmc40 as ive been told). I really do want the hmc40 but i just dont know, through a professional standpoint, what is the better option. I know companies and producers who shoot with 5ds and i also know some that shoot with the hmc150 and sony ex3. I just need some help deciding and some experience from others would help. thanks guys