Shooter
Veteran
FWIW:
Recent experiences (costly lessons actually) and tests have proven to me that the Green Screen material known as Digital Green is far more difficult to deal with than Chroma Green or Chroma Blue.
It is difficult to control in a studio situation because it is literally so bright and then difficult to work with in post subsequently.
Its quality/ feature is that it is bright and requires less light.
That is true and fact is it is actually 3 stops brighter than Chroma Blue and two stops brighter than Chroma Green (reflectance measured on a spotmeter). Its hard to believe your own eyes and thats part of the problem.
I feel it overpowers the camera (HVX202) , the monitor and it also over powers the eye. It is difficult to establish a "correct" level with the f.g / subject even with careful use of scopes.
One of our tests was to run Zebras on a white bg at 100% to let the three chroma chips in frame establish their own levels. There was a grey scale in the frame also. Green in this instance is eye wateringly "bright".
It is difficult to know exactly how to get the exposure on it down enough or conversely the exposure on the subject up enough to compensate. Sort of defeats the purpose of the material IMHO (ie. lose light one side, add light the other = the same lighting cost and time)
Tested by them selves ...the Digital Green seemed to "overdrive" the gamma ie. shift the gamma.
I have just purchased new 20'x 20' Chroma Green & Blue screens. Wont touch Digital Green in the studio ever again! (Save it for exterior film shoots)
Any one else got thoughts - similar /otherwise?
Recent experiences (costly lessons actually) and tests have proven to me that the Green Screen material known as Digital Green is far more difficult to deal with than Chroma Green or Chroma Blue.
It is difficult to control in a studio situation because it is literally so bright and then difficult to work with in post subsequently.
Its quality/ feature is that it is bright and requires less light.
That is true and fact is it is actually 3 stops brighter than Chroma Blue and two stops brighter than Chroma Green (reflectance measured on a spotmeter). Its hard to believe your own eyes and thats part of the problem.
I feel it overpowers the camera (HVX202) , the monitor and it also over powers the eye. It is difficult to establish a "correct" level with the f.g / subject even with careful use of scopes.
One of our tests was to run Zebras on a white bg at 100% to let the three chroma chips in frame establish their own levels. There was a grey scale in the frame also. Green in this instance is eye wateringly "bright".
It is difficult to know exactly how to get the exposure on it down enough or conversely the exposure on the subject up enough to compensate. Sort of defeats the purpose of the material IMHO (ie. lose light one side, add light the other = the same lighting cost and time)
Tested by them selves ...the Digital Green seemed to "overdrive" the gamma ie. shift the gamma.
I have just purchased new 20'x 20' Chroma Green & Blue screens. Wont touch Digital Green in the studio ever again! (Save it for exterior film shoots)
Any one else got thoughts - similar /otherwise?