Anyone know what this was shot with? 5D?

[Kholi]

So as a amatuer, I should be shooting 16mm film because I just don't have the resources to make the 5D look professional. So, professionals have the knowledge and resources to make the 5D look like a million bucks, but the rest of us amatuers need to shoot on Epic, & Red One to get our material up to speed? The amatuer prosumer camera is for the pro DPs and huge crews, and the professional Epic & Red One is for the amatuers.

No, you should be linking us to YOUR work if you're going to call someone else's amateur.

So far, you've only linked to other people's work and cite HOUSE.

Where's your work at?

 

[antiochuswilson]

if it is film find another tk company...
film is cool and should look like this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mwaRjD7rH2U

 

[f64manray]

No, you should be linking us to YOUR work if you're going to call someone else's amateur.

So far, you've only linked to other people's work and cite HOUSE.

Where's your work at?

I'm just getting into this. I'm testing as we speak, but I hardly have to have finished work to have an opinion on a piece of work. Boondock Saints sucked. Do I need to have finished a production to say that? This work that we're talking about is generally well photographed. I should have clarified that the work as whole is not what I would call a high bar piece of work, though it is very good taken for what it is. You don't have to be a film maker to be a film critic. I have 25 years as a still photographer. I have a pair of eyes. when I have a finished work, you will know. It's lighting, lighting, lighting. The camera just has to be good enough. So far I'm pleased with 5D results when its strengths are played to.