Anyone know what this was shot with? 5D?

B

BLUESPIDER

DVXuser Ninja
I just saw this and it kind of looks 5D to me. Anyone got any details on this production? The guy is too good to answer any questions. kidding...

Check it out. Very very nicely done but subject matter isn't my cup of tea. Boring but it was shot really well.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: No media files are hosted on these forums. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website. We can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. If the video does not play, wait a minute or try again later.
I AGREE
 
wow that was beautifully shot...i hope this was shot on the 5d as I am set to order mine monday and this will only make me more happy!!! =)
 
I take that back. The mud is compression... After watching it through, I'd be surprised if this was a DSLR at all. I'm interested in knowing what it was shot on.

16mm is my lowest wager.
 
Last edited:
Ramon Boutviseth said:
looks like the red
Click to expand...

Nah, doesn't look REDish at all.

Kholi said:
I'd be surprised if this was a DSLR at all.
16mm is my lowest wager.
Click to expand...

I´m with you Kholi,
I bet my arse, that it was shot on film and anamorphic lenses.
icon_news.gif


Frank
 
Christopher Ripley who was a producer and DP for this project is (was) a Junior at Yale studying film production. This was shot on Super 16.
It was basicly a student film....

 
Last edited:
DadinWestchester said:
Christopher Ripley who was a producer and DP for this project is (was) a Junior at Yale studying film production. This was shot on Super 16.
It was basicly a student film....
Click to expand...


That's what I thought. And, as Postmaster said, Anamorphic.

Just looking at flesh tones and highlight rolloff, highlight detail it becomes obvious.

Pretty much exactly why the "film is dead" and "good enough" just isn't.
 
Kholi, somewhere in your signature needs to be "VOICE OF REASON". I've really been enjoying your posts recently. Thanks.
 
Kholi said:
That's what I thought. And, as Postmaster said, Anamorphic.

Just looking at flesh tones and highlight rolloff, highlight detail it becomes obvious.

Pretty much exactly why the "film is dead" and "good enough" just isn't.
Click to expand...



Yeah, you're right. Audiences and distributors are always very concerned about "flesh tones and highlight rolloff, highlight detail." :Drogar-BigGrin(DBG)

If it were shot on a 5D, I doubt it'd fall short for most of those concerned, which is why "good enough" means something, especially when HD origination looks virtually indistinguishable from film.

.
 
Chris Santucci said:
Yeah, you're right. Audiences and distributors are always very concerned about "flesh tones and highlight rolloff, highlight detail." :Drogar-BigGrin(DBG)

If it were shot on a 5D, I doubt it'd fall short for most of those concerned, which is why "good enough" means something, especially when HD origination looks virtually indistinguishable from film.

.
Click to expand...

Yes, thank god we have this amatuer looking 16mm film piece to show us the way back to true uncompromising quality because that House episode looked like crap.

Good enough is good enough and House far exceeded that and looks stellar even on my tenth viewing.
 
f64manray said:
Yes, thank god we have this amatuer looking 16mm film piece to show us the way back to true uncompromising quality because that House episode looked like crap.

Good enough is good enough and House far exceeded that and looks stellar even on my tenth viewing.
Click to expand...

*amateur

Darn.. There it is again... HOUSE. A multi-million dollar property.

Say... now that I think about it... have we ever seen any of your work on these boards? Anything to backup how good enough for the low-budget production is, well, good enough?

Please point us to your above-amateur material.

We all obviously know that a few million dollars worth of production and post processing can do for House. What can YOU do, though?
 
Kholi said:
*amateur

Darn.. There it is again... HOUSE. A multi-million dollar property.

Say... now that I think about it... have we ever seen any of your work on these boards? Anything to backup how good enough for the low-budget production is, well, good enough?

Please point us to your above-amateur material.

We all obviously know that a few million dollars worth of production and post processing can do for House. What can YOU do, though?
Click to expand...

Yes! Thank you!!!!

It's not that the camera is good enough for House, it's that House is good enough (in terms of production, and post capability, and also in terms of story, etc) to use it.
 
Kholi said:
*amateur

Darn.. There it is again... HOUSE. A multi-million dollar property.

Say... now that I think about it... have we ever seen any of your work on these boards? Anything to backup how good enough for the low-budget production is, well, good enough?

Please point us to your above-amateur material.

We all obviously know that a few million dollars worth of production and post processing can do for House. What can YOU do, though?
Click to expand...


So as a amatuer, I should be shooting 16mm film because I just don't have the resources to make the 5D look professional. So, professionals have the knowledge and resources to make the 5D look like a million bucks, but the rest of us amatuers need to shoot on Epic, & Red One to get our material up to speed? The amatuer prosumer camera is for the pro DPs and huge crews, and the professional Epic & Red One is for the amatuers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top