Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I seriously considered picking up a C100. But price and lack of slow-mo frame rates were a deal-killer for me.
We have two on pre-order for the company I work for. My bosses love the look of our DSLR work, but they often require us to shoot very long-form stuff (shoot this hours-long board meeting with two or more cameras and make it look good!)
They also loved the footage we shot on a rented C300 several months ago. They've been waffling on buying us our own C300, but the price tag was a bit too much for the in-house video guys. And we really down't have a frequent need for a broadcast-approved codec. It's nice to know the footage we would shoot on a C300 could be acceptable to a top-tier outfit like BBC, but that would never be necessary. We also usually turn our projects around very quickly, and never have the time or the expertise necessary for heavy grading. Although it's nice to know that we can add an external recorder and almost certainly get an image and a codec that is equal to or better than the C300.
When the C100 was announced, it was a pretty easy sell: "Hey remember that $16,000 we all loved? We can get TWO cameras that are very similar, if not identical, for $13,000!"
If you're not doing broadcast work, if you don't need 720/60p, if you're often in a solo run-n-gun situation, if you have a lot of Canon lenses and accessories... seems like a no brainer to me.
$6500 and no ability to shoot variable frame rates make it a non-starter for me.
No 50/60 p in 2012. No for me. I also did not like images. 1 dc could be the way to go.
I think it's a technical issue. They understand there is a need for higher frame rates but these early Cinema EOS cameras use the DV Digic III chip and it's just not capable of 60P according to Larry Thorpe of Canon.Lovely little camera, but like the C300, it's pretty obvious that Canon is losing a lot of potential buyers because they somehow didn't consider the ubiquitous need for over cranking in the industry.
I don't get why they're all focused on one segment (episodic) of the market when everyone from commercial, doc, sports, indie, to even wedding shooters, rely on slo mo to help tell their stories.
Canon C100 cameras are supposed to ship at the end of the month for $6499. 48 month $1 Buyout Lease runs $168 per month.
You can add the Atomos Ninja 2 onto the order for $995.
Put "FREE OVERNIGHT SHIPPING PER TERRY" in the comments when you place the order for an upgraded ride!
![]()
![]()
I'm getting one, basically a step up from DSLR shooting without having to go all the way to a C300 (yet). I think it will suit me very well as I like to be mobile, want to make some no-budget (but quality) documentaries, and all the major issues with it can be solved, except for the higher frame rates:
AVCHD = use an Atomos Ninja 2 or Black Magic HyperDeck Shuttle,
Crappy viewfinder = attach a Zacuto Z-Finder,
Frame Rates = get over it, or hire another camera for slo-mo shots, + I have a 7D for timelapse
1080 = It's gonna be the standard for years to come. 3D TV anyone?
Unfortunately the recorder and Z-Finder will add $1000-$1500 to the cost, pushing it towards NS700 territory.
Having a 7D, the step up should be very noticeable and I have Canon lenses ready to go. I have a Sony NXCAM cam as well but I never felt the passion to use it as much as my 7D. As soon as I saw the C100 I thought I'd take it everywhere and anywhere like my 7D, but get a "real" video camera quality from it. Also at the AU$6K+tax price point it shouldn't take long to recover the outlay.
My $0.05. As soon as I get it I'll be doing some tests with native encoding and with an external recorder.
You will have NIGHTMARES operating Ninja and HDMI.