dustylense
Veteran
Thank Mcgee and others.
We all seek that camera that will give us the image. FOr many they might read that post as a total bash on the BMC. It isn't. If you take it that way you're what is called a fanboy.
When I shot my first tests with the BMC and opened the files my jaw dropped. It wasn't until I put it to work that reality started to hit. Weight, moire, ergonomics, RAW archive space, etc etc.. I was just forced to look for a camera with "balance". THe capability of doing many things right and little things wrong, even if there are wrongs. Which is why I will still recommend the AF100 to guys that are trying to get into a true video system coming from Dslr or just starting. For me it was about condensing and being compatible so I went to the C100.
There is this thought out there that "if" one just has a certain camera that they will become a better shooter overnight. It's nice to have proper tools. But the proper tools are only as good as you are. There is not a single camera that makes one a better photographer. You either have it or you don't. I see things on vimeo every day were the headline is more about what they shot it on than what the piece is about or why. I think to myself, "That could have been shot on a T2i and I would feel the same about it". Then sometimes when there is discussion about this and that camera, people will get VERY passionate about defending a certain camera (probably why Barry avoids a certain website). THe first thing one should consider is NOT everyone shoots the same thing nor cares too. Stuff like "you're stupid avchd 8 bit camera is a wedding camera, not a professional cinema camera". Honestly, I laugh at those people. They expose to me that they see the image on paper written down as camera specs. Plus, I don't get why people bash wedding shooting. It's just about the hardest thing to do properly. ANd when done right and shot wonderfully, there is just as much talent in that wedding video as there is shot in some indie feature. Stop pecker checking and appreciate that filming things comes in many forms and at the same time, there are many cameras out there that do something better than the next.
So people considering selling a camera for another camera (and we will use the AF100 here). Do you NEED that other camera or do you WANT that other camera? Will that camera make you any better for what YOU shoot, and will it lead to greater income? If you come at me with "My clients demand the best and will settle for no less". Well, to me that says you possibly have the budget to rent anyway and you shouldn't have a problem. If your thinking is I get hired with the camera I shoot on, then you are just as good as a technician. I'd be more concerned about being hired for the time and sweat I put in to my craft. Why do the BIG boys use BIG cameras? Because they can afford too. So the hipster producers see that BIG camera and think that is the only way. OR it's the other way around. I shot for the promo of the show Dexter. THey wanted me to shoot on the Canon 5dMk2 against green screen. (My avatar). Why? Because it was hip. I told them there was better technology and they insisted, 5dmk2! In the end I won but still I found it baffling that they wanted the HIP camera instead of a more proper tool.
People call the BMC some sort of revolutionary game changer. In some ways yes. Too me, the single biggest game changers of large chip HD shooting are the 5dmk2 and the AF100. It was the AF100 that lead to the FS100/700, F3, F5, C300/100. I think Panny can do it again and I think they will. Someday there is going to be the AF200 that will be packed with a great codec and shoot to micro p2. And we will all be in the marketplace dumping our cameras that we are shooting on now. Have you seen the F3's for sale used?
Cameras will always get better. No company is going to take large steps backwards. But man, we are at a point that all of these cameras are capable. Just pick the one that is compatible with you and your shooting needs. I still remember the first shots I loaded up from the AF100. Just like the BMC, my jaw dropped!
And if you think the AF100 can't take great pictures? May I suggest you take a look at one of our very own users work here by the name "shooter". He is proof that it's the craft and skill level, not the camera.
We all seek that camera that will give us the image. FOr many they might read that post as a total bash on the BMC. It isn't. If you take it that way you're what is called a fanboy.
When I shot my first tests with the BMC and opened the files my jaw dropped. It wasn't until I put it to work that reality started to hit. Weight, moire, ergonomics, RAW archive space, etc etc.. I was just forced to look for a camera with "balance". THe capability of doing many things right and little things wrong, even if there are wrongs. Which is why I will still recommend the AF100 to guys that are trying to get into a true video system coming from Dslr or just starting. For me it was about condensing and being compatible so I went to the C100.
There is this thought out there that "if" one just has a certain camera that they will become a better shooter overnight. It's nice to have proper tools. But the proper tools are only as good as you are. There is not a single camera that makes one a better photographer. You either have it or you don't. I see things on vimeo every day were the headline is more about what they shot it on than what the piece is about or why. I think to myself, "That could have been shot on a T2i and I would feel the same about it". Then sometimes when there is discussion about this and that camera, people will get VERY passionate about defending a certain camera (probably why Barry avoids a certain website). THe first thing one should consider is NOT everyone shoots the same thing nor cares too. Stuff like "you're stupid avchd 8 bit camera is a wedding camera, not a professional cinema camera". Honestly, I laugh at those people. They expose to me that they see the image on paper written down as camera specs. Plus, I don't get why people bash wedding shooting. It's just about the hardest thing to do properly. ANd when done right and shot wonderfully, there is just as much talent in that wedding video as there is shot in some indie feature. Stop pecker checking and appreciate that filming things comes in many forms and at the same time, there are many cameras out there that do something better than the next.
So people considering selling a camera for another camera (and we will use the AF100 here). Do you NEED that other camera or do you WANT that other camera? Will that camera make you any better for what YOU shoot, and will it lead to greater income? If you come at me with "My clients demand the best and will settle for no less". Well, to me that says you possibly have the budget to rent anyway and you shouldn't have a problem. If your thinking is I get hired with the camera I shoot on, then you are just as good as a technician. I'd be more concerned about being hired for the time and sweat I put in to my craft. Why do the BIG boys use BIG cameras? Because they can afford too. So the hipster producers see that BIG camera and think that is the only way. OR it's the other way around. I shot for the promo of the show Dexter. THey wanted me to shoot on the Canon 5dMk2 against green screen. (My avatar). Why? Because it was hip. I told them there was better technology and they insisted, 5dmk2! In the end I won but still I found it baffling that they wanted the HIP camera instead of a more proper tool.
People call the BMC some sort of revolutionary game changer. In some ways yes. Too me, the single biggest game changers of large chip HD shooting are the 5dmk2 and the AF100. It was the AF100 that lead to the FS100/700, F3, F5, C300/100. I think Panny can do it again and I think they will. Someday there is going to be the AF200 that will be packed with a great codec and shoot to micro p2. And we will all be in the marketplace dumping our cameras that we are shooting on now. Have you seen the F3's for sale used?
Cameras will always get better. No company is going to take large steps backwards. But man, we are at a point that all of these cameras are capable. Just pick the one that is compatible with you and your shooting needs. I still remember the first shots I loaded up from the AF100. Just like the BMC, my jaw dropped!
And if you think the AF100 can't take great pictures? May I suggest you take a look at one of our very own users work here by the name "shooter". He is proof that it's the craft and skill level, not the camera.
Last edited:
