macgregor
Veteran
Lol.
Well i have to say that now that i have a real HD monitor, HDV footage sucks when there is too much moving in the screen! ;D
The same problem than is some old mpeg2 DVDs, when you have a close up of someone´s face, things become strange. It the shot is no so close, It looks perfect.
At least, once deinterlaced and at 720p, it looks reasonably good.
Now, the truth is that the FX1E is an astoundising good camera for SD work if used properly. To me, it gives me all the color sampling that i always wanted, the same progresive mode as the dvx100e, a big LCD screen, a very good lense, and even a lower price than what the DVX100e cost me two years ago.
And it is HD, so i can charge clients more money for the same work. ;D
The HVX should be great, but the footage that i have seen still looks like it has some kind of noise reduction algorithm and strange colors, so maybe the XL H1 is a better camera for the kind of things i like to do.
Well i have to say that now that i have a real HD monitor, HDV footage sucks when there is too much moving in the screen! ;D
The same problem than is some old mpeg2 DVDs, when you have a close up of someone´s face, things become strange. It the shot is no so close, It looks perfect.
At least, once deinterlaced and at 720p, it looks reasonably good.
Now, the truth is that the FX1E is an astoundising good camera for SD work if used properly. To me, it gives me all the color sampling that i always wanted, the same progresive mode as the dvx100e, a big LCD screen, a very good lense, and even a lower price than what the DVX100e cost me two years ago.
And it is HD, so i can charge clients more money for the same work. ;D
The HVX should be great, but the footage that i have seen still looks like it has some kind of noise reduction algorithm and strange colors, so maybe the XL H1 is a better camera for the kind of things i like to do.