JimmyMcV
Member
I'm heavily invested in Canon lenses which is what is making my choice between C100mkii and FS5 a tough one.
And I do read negatives stories about Metabones here and there. About it disengaging, etc.
I do mostly journalistic type work so I can't afford too much down time in the field. It's run and gun.
Any concerns about Metabones out there?
I do love the AF on the Canons and the integration with the lenses and the color science. So, I'm trying to decide if the 4K/slo mo of FS5 will be worth the hassle with the Metabones, with color correcting that blueish flat image, and the lesser performance with AF (though I can get used to relying more on manual).
My work is for the internet, so 4K only has so much value.
And I do read negatives stories about Metabones here and there. About it disengaging, etc.
I do mostly journalistic type work so I can't afford too much down time in the field. It's run and gun.
Any concerns about Metabones out there?
I do love the AF on the Canons and the integration with the lenses and the color science. So, I'm trying to decide if the 4K/slo mo of FS5 will be worth the hassle with the Metabones, with color correcting that blueish flat image, and the lesser performance with AF (though I can get used to relying more on manual).
My work is for the internet, so 4K only has so much value.