another f35 test...

Re: another f35 test...

speedbump:
"Of course, it helps to be in a wonderfully photogenic place like the cityscapes of Krakow! "


It's Warsaw.... :D
 
Re: another f35 test...

01.JPG

02.JPG

03.JPG

04.JPG

05.JPG

06.JPG

07.JPG

08.JPG

09.JPG
 
Re: another f35 test...

This is probably another dumb question. But what do +4 and +10 refer to?

Also, did you have to make the FD mount or are those commonly available?
TIA,
Mike
 
Re: another f35 test...

This is probably another dumb question. But what do +4 and +10 refer to?

... to dvx. +4 and +10 macro gives me enough zoom to frame 35x24 mm reactangle on GG. But i can't say that is properly setting. Maybe "micro35" project will give me answer how to properly magnify,... what lenses/filters i need to completle remove spherical and chromatic aberrations... ?
Fd to 55 mm alluminium tube is made by metal-cutting works[milling-machine,lathe] so it's not avalible
 
Re: another f35 test...

If you used the DVX with adaptor then I am VERY impressed. It looks like an SLR camera shot it. Wow is right. Got any footage. Seeing is believing. ;D
 
Re: another f35 test...

looks great from what i can see, but hard to judge quality with all the color correction and no light arougd the edge of the frame to judge quality near edges of frame or chromatic issues that tens to flare the further from center. but it looks great ..can you please post a clean frame thats well lit acrossed he entire frame so we can judge overall quality clearly?
 
Back
Top