So I have a collection of gorgeous Nikon manual primes that I have been using with an EOS adapter on my Canon.
I'm keeping the Canon (for photography and at least a B camera), and using a GH2 as an additional video cam. I'd love to interchange some of my lenses between cameras, but I'm not sure which adapter makes the most sense.
I'm picturing myself taking lenses off the canon, removing the F-mount adapter, putting on the m4/3s one, and putting it on the camera and vice versa. Then it occured to me- if I leave the EOS adapter on the lens, it's technically an EOS lens, right? Then all I need is an EOS to M4/3s, which will cut out a step and probably make it easier to swap between cameras.
I DO have some native EOS lenses (Tamron, etc) I'd like to use as well, so this way I don't need to buy multiple adapters at first.
Or are doubling up adapters a really bad idea? Too many possible weak points?
I'm keeping the Canon (for photography and at least a B camera), and using a GH2 as an additional video cam. I'd love to interchange some of my lenses between cameras, but I'm not sure which adapter makes the most sense.
I'm picturing myself taking lenses off the canon, removing the F-mount adapter, putting on the m4/3s one, and putting it on the camera and vice versa. Then it occured to me- if I leave the EOS adapter on the lens, it's technically an EOS lens, right? Then all I need is an EOS to M4/3s, which will cut out a step and probably make it easier to swap between cameras.
I DO have some native EOS lenses (Tamron, etc) I'd like to use as well, so this way I don't need to buy multiple adapters at first.
Or are doubling up adapters a really bad idea? Too many possible weak points?