Which Canon cameras (except 5D MKIII with ML) and which Sony cameras shoot FHD RAW?"Sony Color" vs "Canon Color" is pretty meaningless when you are shooting RAW.
…
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Which Canon cameras (except 5D MKIII with ML) and which Sony cameras shoot FHD RAW?"Sony Color" vs "Canon Color" is pretty meaningless when you are shooting RAW.
…
He meant RAW acquisition makes the proprietary color intrinsic to the sensor and brand color science pretty pointless...Which Canon cameras (except 5D MKIII with ML) and which Sony cameras shoot FHD RAW?
Barely? Where? Only at the wheel, shutters on the right and 2nd floor, and very barely aliasing indeed. Not else. Maybe downsampling issues, I guess. Other than that, I see nothing on my 82" projector screen.There's a little bit of moire on the FF video at :20, the metal roof just above the 300mm F2.8 text, but its barely noticable.
Sorry, but I think it's wrong to draw too many precise conclusions from real life images and via Youtube. Too many variables. The samples are pretty good IMO (especially for a stills camera!Love the detail. There's a little bit of moire on the FF video at :20, the metal roof just above the 300mm F2.8 text, but its barely noticable. The shots at :24 of the post with the backlit flowers and the mask at :28 are soft, no pop compared to the rest.
The 5dII is what? 7 Years old. One would expect this camera to perform better than that. But in the A7rII I will say, "That highlight aliasing tho".Exactly.
One thing is certain, though. As Samuel has fairly pointed out, 5DII at wide end there would surely rainbow in every corner of such 'malicious' setupYoutube wouldn't serve as excuse
It is promising, to say the least.
He meant RAW acquisition makes the proprietary color intrinsic to the sensor and brand color science pretty pointless...
I'd say December 2014 a7II is much worse than a 5DII as far as aliasing/moiré concerns and a7RII was thought instead as 1st really hybrid of this series (a7S can be a way more useful as cine camera than as stills camera).The 5dII is what? 7 Years old. One would expect this camera to perform better than that. But in the A7rII I will say, "That highlight aliasing tho".
I read somewhere there won't be a7SII, confirmed by some SONY rep according to the messenger.Just a side question...if the A7RII is being released in the next week or so, when can we expect the A7SII?
In order to not affect sales, I would expect the A7SII to be released next year, but maybe they are different enough cameras that they wouldn't step on each other? Or is it common for Sony to push different versions of products out shortly one after another? TY.
Ya but it's a ~ $7,500 combo as of now. A7S is $2,500. A A7S based camcorder - sharing the same sensor, with an updated feature set such as internal 4K - shouldn't run more than $4,000. Right now, Sony only has the small sensor 4K models in that range (AX1 @ $4,500 and Z100 @ $5,500, each two years old). If you look at their competitors, JVC has had an s35 MFT camcorder for $4,000, with a Metabones adapter, out for several months. Me thinks it's time for Sony to retain their "innovation leader" mantle in this segment and update their whole camcorder lineup.The FS700 is making a bit of a comeback with the 7Q+...there has been some really nice footage floating around here.
I'm liking this camera. Since you can also crop down to S35 to get 4K, that has a lot of potential. (No pixel binning, less rolling shutter). Plus with built in stabilization, using a Metabones and any lens will be nice. I'll wait for real world tests by the pros though.