Adam J McKay
Veteran
That is definitely exciting news. I can't wait to get my hands on one for testing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To be perfectly honest, I don't think there would have been much at all gained from an external recorder. In my past experiences with the external recorders, the main benefit you see from them is in high-motion, high-detail scenes, which the AF-100 nailed with the on-board codec. And there's also the benefit of going from 4:2:0 to 4:2:2 color, but that doesn't really seem to deliver much "room" in shadow detail, from what I've seen. Like Jan said, it's not a $5,000 Arri Alexa, and there are always going to be things that cameras costing three, four and ten times as much as the AF-100 can deliver that the AF-100 won't quite measure up to. But I've been more than happy with the quality of the images we were able to get from the AF-100, and I'm just as happy knowing that there are cameras like the EPIC and Alexa out there, if I feel like I need what they offer.
As far as workflow goes, we (obviously) recorded AVCCAM in-camera, then transcoded (via Log & Transfer) into ProResHQ for editing. These ProResHQ files were then provided directly to the colorist, who worked with them in Baselight before laying them off with color correction. The EDL from Final Cut was then re-assembled with the color-corrected clips, giving us our current "online" picture. ...
Well, actually, if you're on practically *any* editor you can edit with the native codec. Premiere CS5, Vegas, EDIUS (and EDIUS Neo), SpeedEdit, they all support native codec editing. The question is whether it's a satisfactory experience or not. On EDIUS and CS5, it cuts like butter on an appropriately-fast system. On Vegas, not so much.If you are on Premiere you can edit with the native codec.
If you are on Premiere you can edit with the native codec.
I am aware of that but my question related to high end (ie.not Premiere NLE) post production.
The Colorist in this project did his work in FilmBase from Pro Res files.
What would I have given him from a Windows system?
Could he have worked with AVCHD source files?
Just trying to establish a potential workflow.
I've worked with pro res files in windows.
But you cannot encode them in Windows. That is the problem.
I know he can work with ProRes (FCP), DNxHD (Avid) and .MXF files. I've asked him for a more complete run-down of options.
UPDATED
The following file formats are also compatible with the Baselight system…
DPX
R3D (transcoded to DPX)
.cine
ARRIRAW
Phantom RAW
I would be adverse to going too far down the ProRes route.
( Although I can edit it... I cant export it and I wouldnt trust Apple not to lock it up even further than it already is and destroy my cross platform workflows)