Homunculus
Carbonite Member
good job on the film. it seems to have been pushed way too hard in post though. the final image is extremely mushy almost to the point of being unwatchable to me. what gives?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
good job on the film. it seems to have been pushed way too hard in post though. the final image is extremely mushy almost to the point of being unwatchable to me. what gives?
good job on the film. it seems to have been pushed way too hard in post though. the final image is extremely mushy almost to the point of being unwatchable to me. what gives?
good job on the film. it seems to have been pushed way too hard in post though. the final image is extremely mushy almost to the point of being unwatchable to me. what gives?
Well done guys and gals.. and thanx for all your efforts in launching the new camera and posting your results with so much detail.
They have been invaluable from a real world pov.
Looking forward to what follows as other film makers , including me, get their hands on the AF100's from herein.
I thought the production values were really solid; the camera work was fluid, the lighting was subtle and natural. The camera looked good except for some blow-out highlights. I thought the storytelling and writing left a lot to be desired tho. The dream sequence was confusing and just didn't work, and overall the editing had a clunky feel to it. I know a lot of effort went into this, and I respect that, but overall, not quite ready for prime time.
their faces are pure mush and have no detail
the final image is extremely mushy almost to the point of being unwatchable to me. what gives
the skin tones on their faces.by tones i mean the textures, seems to lack resolution and sharpness, even the likes of which ive seen in other af100 videos
going to sleep now but ok tomorrow i will rewatch whole movie again sober (lol) and point out specifically what i am seeingI honestly don't know what to tell you, Homunculus. I've just scrubbed through the Vimeo-encoded clip, the original .MOV file it was compressed from, and the ProResHQ color-corrected clips, and I can clearly see detail in many of the skin tones. In fact, our colorist remarked on how well the skin tones were rendered. I don't doubt that you're seeing what you're seeing, but it doesn't reflect what I see in the original footage, or any of the transcoded clips along the workflow. Maybe you could tell us just how you're viewing the clips?
their faces are pure mush and have no detail
I can appreciate your support John - but people are entitled to their critiques and opinions as long as they express them civily.
Let's make sure we keep things respectful on both sides here.
their faces are pure mush and have no detail
Oh...well...that's because I'm fat. :grin:
Welcome to DVXUser. I'm no-one...just another member. That said...you may want to provide some points of reference for your opinion. (ie: link to your work) That's a mighty big opinion....we'll all hope that your reel gives us a point of reference as to why it's so big. If its not....uh....chill just a bit. We believe in respect here...so make sure to show some. Cool.
Specifically, "I thought the storytelling and writing left a lot to be desired tho....and overall the editing had a clunky feel to it....not quite ready for prime time."
You must be entering the next DVXFest and you're going to show us all how it's done? This IS NOT personal from me to you. It's just getting a bit old to have someone with less than 50posts talking like they're Francis Ford Coppola. So...again...respect, right? Chill, right?
Oh...well...that's because I'm fat. :grin:
Looks great, Stephen. Thanks to all you guys for letting me take part.