5Dmk2 vs 5Dmk3 vs AF101

[Alpha Beta Omega]

 

[Chris Santucci]

Nice, real nice. Thanks. Looks like there's no major difference between the MKII and MKIII, except that the MKIII is a little softer.

 

[Adam J McKay]

In this test, I actually prefer the D2. Interesting.

 

[vision_filmz]

No disrespect, but I truly find test like this pointless.. Honest opinion they all look good, lets see some real world examples on a actual shoot.

 

[dustylense]

I would have shot it static, but then with a slow pan left right and up down.

 

[PappasArts]

Thanks for sharing, it's very much appreciated.

The AF101 held its own, and seems more accurate in this test as best I can tell with vimeo compression. There all good in the end.

Pappas
http://pappasarts.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/pappasarts

 

[Alpha Beta Omega]

Exactly what I concluded from this brief test. All cameras look good and even at 400% not much different. But All-I is noisier than the other.

 

[maarek]

Movement shows up aliasing as it starts crawling around. No movement = aliasing hard to spot.

There's a GREAT moire test here, at the bottom, compare the mark II and III.

http://carousel.hu/c300/?page_id=395

 

[Alpha Beta Omega]

I'll check that video out thanks. My test was in detail and not touching moire really. I wanted to see how much detail in a real life texture each camera had.

 

[ROCKMORE]

Exactly what I concluded from this brief test. All cameras look good and even at 400% not much different. But All-I is noisier than the other.

It may be a good idea to do the same test with some movement which is where these cameras get in to trouble.