XCheck
Veteran
Big question:
I was AC-ing on a shoot last Sat. with the DVX100A. The director wanted 2.35:1 aspect ratio that was to be cropped from an unsqueezed (4:3) frame. The DP gave me a framing chart with all different framing marks and asked me to make a mask on the flip-out display for the 2.35 frame.
Knowing that the flip-out only shows something close to TV safe area of the frame, I temporarily turned the camera into letterbox mode, framed the chart so that it's 16:9 marks aligned exactly with the edges of the letterbox bars, and then made framing mark on the viewfinder where the 2.35 marks were. Something like this:
We didn't have a proper production monitor available to see the framing with underscan, so I figured this method would be the next best thing.
The trouble is, now the DP tells me the framing is closer to 1.85:1 than 2.35:1. I have no reason to question that, except for possible oversight on his part when the footage is brought to a computer for editing (square pixels rather than 0.91 for NTSC comes to my mind as a possible cause as 2.35 * 0.91 = 2.14, half-way between 1.85 and 2.35).
I would like to know if one of your gurus can comment on my method of establishing the 2.35:1 framing, and if it's correct, what else could lead to the perception that the framing is wrong in post? I am pretty sure they use Avid Express for editing.
Thank you,
Jerry
I was AC-ing on a shoot last Sat. with the DVX100A. The director wanted 2.35:1 aspect ratio that was to be cropped from an unsqueezed (4:3) frame. The DP gave me a framing chart with all different framing marks and asked me to make a mask on the flip-out display for the 2.35 frame.
Knowing that the flip-out only shows something close to TV safe area of the frame, I temporarily turned the camera into letterbox mode, framed the chart so that it's 16:9 marks aligned exactly with the edges of the letterbox bars, and then made framing mark on the viewfinder where the 2.35 marks were. Something like this:
Code:
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////// <- upper letter box bar
/\16:9 16:9/\
->2.35:1 2.35:1<-
->2.35:1 2.35:1<-
\/16:9 16:9\/
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////// <- lower letter box bar
We didn't have a proper production monitor available to see the framing with underscan, so I figured this method would be the next best thing.
The trouble is, now the DP tells me the framing is closer to 1.85:1 than 2.35:1. I have no reason to question that, except for possible oversight on his part when the footage is brought to a computer for editing (square pixels rather than 0.91 for NTSC comes to my mind as a possible cause as 2.35 * 0.91 = 2.14, half-way between 1.85 and 2.35).
I would like to know if one of your gurus can comment on my method of establishing the 2.35:1 framing, and if it's correct, what else could lead to the perception that the framing is wrong in post? I am pretty sure they use Avid Express for editing.
Thank you,
Jerry