Search results

I havent seen any rates for news stringers I'm thinking i will get my new a1 and change my rates per story what do you all think would be a good rate for news footage per station per story.

It's here (manual) - http://consumer.usa.canon.com/app/pdf/dv/XLH1_manual.pdf and here (brochure) - http://consumer.usa.canon.com/app/pdf/camcorder/XLH1_Brochure.pdf

Does anybody know, what it is doing in the HD100 technically?

If You are able to see SAT.1, watch it on 2005-11-10, 11:15 p.m.. The whole broadcasting was filmed with the JVC in its 25p mode. Source: http://www.jvc-pro.de/jvcpro http://www.sat1.de/lifestyle_magazine/24stunden/themenarchiv/content/05967

Will there be an anamorphotic adapter for the HVX200 to shoot in 1:2,35?

Please have a look here: http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?t=53206.

Three days ago a man from Panasonic Broadcast Europe told me, that in Europe the HVX200 will be sold only with two P2 cards à 8 GB inclusive. No chance to get the camera without the two cards. That means, the price, you have to pay for the HVX, will be much higher than in America for instance...

What will be the resolution of the lens? Will it be HD?

If You life in or nearby Berlin, Neu Anspach, Wiesbaden, Ludwigsburg or Munich, just have a look here: http://panasonic-broadcast.de/index.cfm?uuid=34A137CDC09F11269B138EAFB474FED8.

Panasonic.com states December 2005, while Panasonic Europe states March 2006 - that is a difference of three months? Can that be?

What happened to DVCPRO P? Why is it not provided with the HVX200?

To sum up, you can say that the JVC GY-HD100 has the following problems regarding the picture: 1. Chromatic aberration 2. Smear (http://www.time-code-media.de/blitzer.jpg, http://www.time-code-media.de/blitzer2.jpg) 3. Split screen (http://www.time-code-media.de/split.jpg) 4. Dead pixels...

Here are two pictures shot with the HD100. How could you avoid the smear? http://www.time-code-media.de/blitzer.jpg http://www.time-code-media.de/blitzer2.jpg

Yesterday Canon Germany published its first information about the new XL H1, where You can read, that the camera will record 1080 in 25p(rogressive)! Available from December 2005 for 9.149,00 Euro (incl. of VAT). Here is the source...

At the Panasonic homepage you can read, that the camera will have a 1/3" 16:9 native progressive 3-CCD imager - does that mean, that the CCDs will have a resolution of 1280 x 1080 respectively 1.382.400 pixels each, at least?

May somebody explain to me, what the differences are between an interlaced and a progressive working CCD? I know, what interlaced and progressive means, but not according to a CCD. Can an interlaced working CCD not also work as a progressive one and the other way round?

See this: http://panasonic-broadcast.de/index.cfm?uuid=89F984D64063C79FCA295FE20E910B43.

Now the whole "under 10.000" discussion has an end. JVC Pro UK has notified: "The [...] list price, including 16x Fujinon zoom lens, will be under 6,000€ (Six thousand Euros)." Read it at: http://www.jvcpro.co.uk/news/releases_html?atype=release&releaseID=1192.

Although the HVX-200 seems to have no DVCPRO HD-LP mode, I would like to know, how this mode works. I have read, that it uses only half of the track width, and so there is a double play duration. But then is there also a lack of quality?

Will the HVX200 come in two version, one for NTSC (480i/p) and another one for PAL (576i/p), or will there be one for all? And, by the way, 1080p - does that not mean 1920 x 1080 pixel and three CCDs with 2.073.600 pixel each? I am totally confused...