THE REPLACER - hybridtheory aka Ben Sliker

Ben Sliker

Ben Sliker

Pain In The Ass 2.0
Hey DVXUSERS!
Any comments, questions, constructive criticism is welcome. I'm sure to be popping in and out of here often.

Thanks to the few people who helped me shoot, esp. Brad, John, and Marie.
 
Shhhhh. I thought that was the look you were going for, kinda cold and distant. There was a section in there that reminded me of the scene in Broken. Interesting concept. It looked like you put some thought into it, a bigger hand running the show. You kept me on board for the whole ride, good job.
 
This was cool.
I agree with Blaine, in which he's referring to the guy strapped to the chair. (I think)
That scene was very well put together and executed. I loved the look of it.
The whole piece had a very strange and ominous tone to it which I think was good.
Well done.
 
haha, yeah, that's what we were going for, it doesn't bother me for most of it, just that the title pages are dark grey and not black, why i have no idea. Thanks Alot Blaine.
 
I really liked this film! One of the films in the better category. I liked the montage of the guy doing his routine each day. Very cool way to tell your story. I'll have a little more in depth review after I watch it through again. Good job! Yeah, I loved the look of the guy strapped to the chair too.
 
Filmjunkie677 said:
This was cool.
I agree with Blaine, in which he's referring to the guy strapped to the chair. (I think)
That scene was very well put together and executed. I loved the look of it.
The whole piece had a very strange and ominous tone to it which I think was good.
Well done.
Click to expand...


THAT WAS ME!!! I had to direct the film being strapped to that chair for 4.5 hours! I couldn't feel my right hand for a while afterwards ...
 
hybridtheory said:
THAT WAS ME!!! I had to direct the film being strapped to that chair for 4.5 hours! I couldn't feel my right hand for a while afterwards ...
Click to expand...

Dang! Props to you bro. That must have been fun ;)
 
I was digging this one. Interesting look. The use of darkness/shadows was very cool. I especially liked the eye effect at the end.
 
I got to be honest ... someone PM'd me asking if I understood the film ... which I'd not seen yet. If it wasn't for the fact that I was REALLY concentrating on following along, I probably wouldn't have "gotten" it the first time, and I don't think the viewer should have to work so hard to understand something ... at least not usually.

Anyway, the basement/chair scene was well done. Creepy, to say the least. Also cool that you were the main character in this ... you have a good look, and like the eye thing that you did in the end when you blinked.

However, the editing/layout of this was confusing as crap to me. The very opening type with subject, irriversable, replace, etc. was LOST because it's the first thing and we don't know why. By the time we see the character going down the stairs for like the 5th time, we've forgotten all about the opening frame/title ... at least I did, until WMV looped again and I saw that part for the second time ... then I was like "Oh, okay, I get it now ... kinda'".

If that had popped on AFTER the guy had fallen down the stairs, it would have made more sense.

Also, if at the ending, we see HOW the guy's life was saved, there would have been more pay off. What's with the crucial few seconds of delay? We have to assume he would have been SMASHED by a truck blowing through the interesection just up the road, or something, but we never see it, let alone hear the screach of tires, horn honking, the guy yelling at whatever just barely misses him, etc. Also, why is this one person so important?

Theres a difference to leaving the viewer hanging wanting to see what's going to happen next vs. leaving them hanging with valid questions that should be answered, since they were introduced to a degree. A little less time going through the routine, or stealing some time from the basement scene, and you could have quickly answered some of the other questions.
 
Envision said:
I got to be honest ... someone PM'd me asking if I understood the film ... which I'd not seen yet. If it wasn't for the fact that I was REALLY concentrating on following along, I probably wouldn't have "gotten" it the first time, and I don't think the viewer should have to work so hard to understand something ... at least not usually.

Anyway, the basement/chair scene was well done. Creepy, to say the least. Also cool that you were the main character in this ... you have a good look, and like the eye thing that you did in the end when you blinked.

However, the editing/layout of this was confusing as crap to me. The very opening type with subject, irriversable, replace, etc. was LOST because it's the first thing and we don't know why. By the time we see the character going down the stairs for like the 5th time, we've forgotten all about the opening frame/title ... at least I did, until WMV looped again and I saw that part for the second time ... then I was like "Oh, okay, I get it now ... kinda'".

If that had popped on AFTER the guy had fallen down the stairs, it would have made more sense.

Also, if at the ending, we see HOW the guy's life was saved, there would have been more pay off. What's with the crucial few seconds of delay? We have to assume he would have been SMASHED by a truck blowing through the interesection just up the road, or something, but we never see it, let alone hear the screach of tires, horn honking, the guy yelling at whatever just barely misses him, etc. Also, why is this one person so important?

Theres a difference to leaving the viewer hanging wanting to see what's going to happen next vs. leaving them hanging with valid questions that should be answered, since they were introduced to a degree. A little less time going through the routine, or stealing some time from the basement scene, and you could have quickly answered some of the other questions.
Click to expand...

First off, thanks for the critique, i enjoy the challenge.
1. the opening statement is an homage to THX-1138, a movie that really doesn't make sense a lot of the time, and the title is meant to make you think, if i put up there "Broken leg ... must replace" it would be, in a sense, lame. It was put there so that you start to think about what it could mean. And I wholeheartedly disagree with the statement that a viewer should not have to work to understand what they are watching.

2. There is one statement that should solidy tell you what this film is about "That's Why I'm here Christian, to replace you" ... I can't explain it better than that.

3. The man at the end IS NOT IMPORTANT and for all that it matters, doesn't have to be. It's the replacers control over earth that does matter. I found that this is depressing for Christian because his life really doesn't matter, he had one purpose, and he messed it up, so now he dies. (Think of it as trying to keep a butterfly effect intact).

4. What are these valid questions? You know that the man's life was saved because the replacer was there to bump into him ... I think I would have lost a lot from my short if i (for a lack of a better phrase) spelled it out for everyone.

Again, thanks for the criticism!
 
Last edited:
Well, thankfully, since they're just opinions I can't really be wrong. From my perspective, as an audience member watching for the first time, they were important to me.

If I stated that he DIDN'T break his leg, when it's clear he did, then yes, I can be wrong ... but no one can ever be wrong in the questions they're left with. Perhaps I'll be the only one with these questions ... if so, I'm in the minority and every film will have a minority group that feels a certain way, while everyone else champions it.

If others agree, then while you chose the artistic path of leaving those things unexplained, because you felt they weren't important, the audience you're showcasing it to feels otherwise.

No worries either way, and again, it was someone else that brought it to my attention with a PM saying they had no clue what the film was about & wanted my take on it. I DID understand that THE REPLACER was there to replace Christian ... pretty simple. What I didn't understand was the IMPORTANCE of it. Since he went on to say that there was a man's life that was supposed to be saved, to me, as the viewer, it's saying there's something important about that man.

Obviously, I'm an idiot.
 
Envision said:
Well, thankfully, since they're just opinions I can't really be wrong. From my perspective, as an audience member watching for the first time, they were important to me.

If I stated that he DIDN'T break his leg, when it's clear he did, then yes, I can be wrong ... but no one can ever be wrong in the questions they're left with. Perhaps I'll be the only one with these questions ... if so, I'm in the minority and every film will have a minority group that feels a certain way, while everyone else champions it.

If others agree, then while you chose the artistic path of leaving those things unexplained, because you felt they weren't important, the audience you're showcasing it to feels otherwise.

No worries either way, and again, it was someone else that brought it to my attention with a PM saying they had no clue what the film was about & wanted my take on it. I DID understand that THE REPLACER was there to replace Christian ... pretty simple. What I didn't understand was the IMPORTANCE of it. Since he went on to say that there was a man's life that was supposed to be saved, to me, as the viewer, it's saying there's something important about that man.

Obviously, I'm an idiot.
Click to expand...

What's with the idiot line ... there's no need for that. I just disagree with some of the points you made.

Sorry you got the impression that I was telling you that you were wrong.

Why is the replacer replacing Christian important? Because something went wrong, which threatens the replacers control. And now they have to fix it. Christian isn't important, the man sure isn't. Keeping Control is.

Maybe there's room to explore a larger plot line in something that is longer than 6 min, but I really feel everything comes together when he turns around and exposes who he is, laughs (because he's completed his mission) and leaves.

Peace.
Ben.
 
Ben,
good stuff.

I LOVED the openign shot of the clock. Really clever. how on earth did you come up with that idea?

I do have to agree though that I was distracted fromt eh end of the film by waitign to see how the life was saved. I was waiting for somethign to fall just in front of the guy after he was stopped and I may have mised one of the points of the film because of it.

Well shot scene inside, I liked how you kept the camera moving. The guy was tied down to the chair and coudln't move, but the scene never remained still. Nice.

- Mikko
 
Got'cha, sorry, my bad. I did read into it that you were telling me my opinion(s) were wrong. Nothing worse than taking the time to give someone your honest feedback (both good & bad) and having them blast you back.

That's how I took it, and apparently I was wrong. Thanks for the clarification.
 
mikkowilson said:
Ben,
good stuff.

I LOVED the openign shot of the clock. Really clever. how on earth did you come up with that idea?

I do have to agree though that I was distracted fromt eh end of the film by waitign to see how the life was saved. I was waiting for somethign to fall just in front of the guy after he was stopped and I may have mised one of the points of the film because of it.

Well shot scene inside, I liked how you kept the camera moving. The guy was tied down to the chair and coudln't move, but the scene never remained still. Nice.

- Mikko
Click to expand...

The clock/glasses thing was just something i had done before, unfortunetly, with the DVX's long focus, you have to place the glasses and the object that you are focusing to pretty far apart from each other. I need to get one of those G35's. Video focus frustrates me, you have to get creative with placement.

Now that I think of it, a narrow miss at the end might have worked, it might have shifted the focus off the replacer which i wanted to keep it on. Perhaps just a bus passing in front of the man would have worked, but hindsight's always 20/20 right?
 
hybridtheory,

I've heard and said many variations on the old "It's X meets Y, set against the backdrop of Z" pitch...but I must admit your film may have taken the proverbial cake for uniqueness.
I can hear the pitch now, "It's Groundhog's Day meets The Prophecy, set against the backdrop of Hostel."

Seriously though, I think you laid the groundwork for a strong premise. Personally I know that I have the face for directing, and am much more comfortable behind the camera (save for perhaps a Hitchcockian cameo or two)...but I must say you turned in a decent performance for an auteur. Cheers on that.

I also thought you had solid dialog especially during the "torture" sequence.

I do think the story could have been polished into something a little more clear...and a little more sci-fi like.
Not to say yours doesn't qualify as such...
but I feel it is more of an interpretive subject matter that some may be left with a science fiction vibe, while others a more supernatural one.

I look forward to seeing more from you.
 
Well I haven't read anything that anyone else has posted, so I'm sorry if I repeat anything that has been said, but...

The Replacer – The first thing I need to say is I have that same green chair from Walmart of my porch. The beginning of Monday through Friday I enjoyed and I like how you mixed it up just enough to keep it interesting. The only thing that sticks with me is the sky conditions seem to change just a bit. For the stair fall I like the close up of the knee and enjoyed the foley effect. Great use of sound there. I liked your shot choice for the chair scene and thought it worked well. I wasn’t crazy about the whole concept of the replacer and I thought that some of the dialogue got a little cheesy at times. The camera movement in this part though was great. I like the low light and the blacks. Your location was perfect for what you were doing. The tubing, well that could have been more elaborate, but I thought it was good. The payoff at the end didn’t do it for me, but this was a good looking project that hinted just a bit of video that was overcome by good camera work. I enjoyed it. For some reason though, it did feel a bit like Broken. I don’t know if this was intentional, but it just felt that way, even the name Christian being used. Just something that stuck out at me. I would say that this film had one of the better jobs of sound in general with no drop outs, and it just worked for me. I certainly enjoyed it. Good job.
 
Envision said:
Theres a difference to leaving the viewer hanging wanting to see what's going to happen next vs. leaving them hanging with valid questions that should be answered, since they were introduced to a degree. A little less time going through the routine, or stealing some time from the basement scene, and you could have quickly answered some of the other questions.
Click to expand...

I agree with Envision here... I did read your reply and get what you were trying to do, but I thought it felt unfinished... and what you were saying that you were trying to get across isn't what I got -- Christian's one purpose, the depression he is supposed to feel... it didn't shine through for me.

That said...

I though it was an incredibly cool concept... Your cinematography and editing were very good, and I LOVE when we first see Christian tied up in the chair... excellent shot and lighting.

(I hear your frustration about compression... I personally thing WMV is about the worst format and it ruins the color).

Great ominous shot with the line about the eyes.

Liked the shots with the glasses and the clock in the beginning.

Your editing really matched the feel... I didn't even think about it and had to go back and watch again to specifically watch just the editing... and it's GOOD when you don't "notice" it :)

The music really suited the story, and the sound was very good... though there were part the dialogue could have been louder, or fuller. I loved how the music realled paced along with the story... especially in the beginning with the Monday through Friday repetitive nature of the lead's life.

Like I said right off, the ending was the problem for me... it just seemed anti-climatic for such a good concept.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top