Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Of course you can compare the two recorders like cars, but there are a lot of options on more expensive gear that just isnt needed. Such as recording at 192 or recording two file formats at once. I am trying to distinguish if these features are practical, because Id prefer not to pay for options I wont use just to say I own a lamborghini.
| IMPORTANT NOTICE: No media files are hosted on these forums. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website. We can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. If the video does not play, wait a minute or try again later. |
| I AGREE |
Awesome recorder, and mic demo. You know Guy, you can embed the Vimeo videos by copying only the numbers at the end of the video's URL, then hitting the "V" button of your message, then pasting in the numbers between the brackets. It took me a few tries to figure that out. It's better than YouTube and the video is properly displayed without having to select "I Agree" to see it.
any of the major audio resellers will have it, trew and b&h to name some. the benefit i see of the fusion over the hsp82 is its size, weight and media. the fusion is pretty small and lighter than a 788 so it can easily fit in a pegz2 bag. and also there's the zaxnet which some users will find very important.
but if it were a cart based setup, i think i'd be psyched on a the hsp82 with its breakout fader box(RC-F82). on paper it looks to be a great unit.
but they both record to 2 CF slots for redundancy, which is pretty sweet.
Zaxcom is the industry standard. Tascam is not.